A constitutional referendum was held in Chile on 4 September 2022, in order to determine whether the public agreed with the text of a new Political Constitution of the Republic drawn up by the Constitutional Convention. It was commonly referred to as the "exit plebiscite" (plebiscito de salida).

The proposed constitution, which had faced "intense criticism that it was too long, too left-wing and too radical", was rejected by a margin of 62% to 38%.

Date

The election at the National Stadium in Santiago.
'Rechazo' campaign, 1 September 2022.

According to the itinerary originally proposed for the constituent process, it was estimated that the plebiscite to approve or reject the text of the new Constitution would take place in September 2021, if the Constitutional Convention met its term of nine months and did not request the three-month extension, or in March 2022, if it requested such an extension. In addition, the exit plebiscite could not be held 60 days before or after another election, nor could it be held in January or February, which would have placed it on the first Sunday in March if an extension were requested.

As a result of the postponement of the first plebiscite to 25 October 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the date of the exit plebiscite was also modified. It was projected to take place during the third quarter of 2022, in September at the latest. In April 2022, it was announced that the referendum would be held on 4 September.

Format

Article 142 of the 1980 Political Constitution of the Republic of Chile indicates the text of the ballot in the plebiscite:

In the aforementioned plebiscite, the citizens will have an electoral card that will contain the following question ... : "Do you approve the text of the New Constitution proposed by the Constitutional Convention?". Under the question posed there will be two horizontal stripes, one next to the other. The first one will have the expression "Approve" at the bottom and the second one, the word "Reject", so that the voter can mark his preference over one of the alternatives.

— Political Constitution of the Republic of Chile of 1980, article 142

There was no contingency plan in place as to what will happen if the new constitution is rejected. Chilean human rights lawyer Dinka Benítez stated that "given that 80 percent of those who voted in the plebiscite want a new constitution, it seems that Chile ... will necessarily have to find a way to have a new constitution" in some form, and that a "reject" vote would not necessarily be a death knell for constitutional reform.

Proposed new constitution

Party positions

ChoicePartiesPolitical orientationLeaderRef
Y ApproveApruebo Dignidad (AD)ProgressivismGabriel Boric
Democratic Revolution (RD)Democratic socialismJuan Ignacio Latorre
Social Convergence (CS)Libertarian socialismAlondra Arellano
CommonsSocialism of the 21st centuryMarco Velarde
Communist Party of Chile (PCCh)CommunismGuillermo Teillier
Social Green Regionalist Federation (FREVS)RegionalismFlavia Torrealba Diaz
Humanist Action (AH)HumanismTomás Hirsch
Unir Movement (UNIR)ProgressivismMarcelo Díaz
Democratic Socialism (SD)Social democracy
Socialist Party of Chile (PS)Social democracyPaulina Vodanovic
Party for Democracy (PPD)ProgressivismNatalia Piergentili
Radical Party of Chile (PR)Social liberalismLeonardo Cubillos
Liberal Party of Chile (PL)Social liberalismVlado Mirosevic
Christian Democratic Party (PDC)Christian democracyFelipe Delpin
Humanist Party (PH)Universal humanismNatalia Ibáñez
Green Ecologist Party (PEV)Green politicsFélix González Gatica
N RejectChile Vamos (ChV)Liberal conservatism
Independent Democratic Union (UDI)ConservatismJavier Macaya
National Renewal (RN)ConservatismFrancisco Chahuán
Political Evolution (Evópoli)Classical liberalismLuz Poblete Coddou
Republican Party (PLR)National conservatismRojo Edwards
Party of the People (PDG)PopulismFranco Parisi

Opinion polls

The tables below list opinion polling results in reverse chronological order, showing the most recent first and using the dates when the survey fieldwork was done, as opposed to the date of publication. Where the fieldwork dates are unknown, the date of publication is given instead. The highest percentage figure in each polling survey is displayed with its background shaded in the leading option's color. The "Lead" column on the right shows the percentage-point difference between the options in a poll.

Voting intention estimates

The table below lists weighted voting intention estimates. Refusals are generally excluded from the party vote percentages, while question wording and the treatment of "don't know" responses and those not intending to vote may vary between polling organizations.

Color key:

Poll conducted after legal ban on opinion polls

Polling firm/CommissionerFieldwork dateSample sizeApproveRejectLead
2022 Chilean national plebiscite4 Sep 202238.161.9–23.8
AtlasIntel1–3 Sep 20223,27041.958.1–16.2
Cadem31 Aug–2 Sep 20221,41547.152.9–5.8
UDD17–19 Aug 20228,69144.355.7–11.4
Cadem17–19 Aug 20221,00744.655.4–10.8
AtlasIntel16–19 Aug 20222,73541.658.4–16.8
Activa16–19 Aug 20222,08941.858.2–16.5
Signos14–19 Aug 20221,09548.151.9–3.8
Cadem10–12 Aug 20221,01545.254.8–9.5
Activa10–12 Aug 20221,51443.356.7–13.4
Signos7–11 Aug 202272846.553.5–7.0
Data Influye5–7 Aug 20221,65047.352.7–5.4
Cadem3–5 Aug 202270444.056.0–12.0
Activa2–5 Aug 20221,22440.259.8–19.6
Signos31 Jul–4 Aug 202271545.454.6–9.2
MORI/FIEL28 Jul–2 Aug 20221,50048.451.6–3.3
Criteria29 Jul–1 Aug 20221,00044.455.6–11.2
Cadem27–29 Jul 202270644.255.8–11.6
Signos24–28 Jul 202277843.956.1–12.2
Criteria22–26 Jul 20221,51245.055.0–10.0
Cadem20–22 Jul 202270145.354.7–9.4
Activa19–22 Jul 20221,24139.660.4–20.8
UDD20–21 Jul 20228,54243.256.8–13.6
Signos18–21 Jul 202270142.557.5–15.0
Cadem13–15 Jul 202270241.658.4–16.8
Signos11–14 Jul 202270336.963.1–26.2
Cadem6–8 Jul 202270839.860.2–20.4
Activa5–8 Jul 20221,20537.362.7–24.6
Signos4–7 Jul 202271039.360.7–21.6
Feedback4–6 Jul 20222,84239.560.5–21.0
Data Influye1–4 Jul 20221,55547.152.9–5.8
Criteria30 Jun–4 Jul 20221,01839.260.8–21.6
Cadem29 Jun–1 Jul 202270740.060.0–20.0
UDD28–29 Jun 20221,04442.257.8–15.6
Signos26–29 Jun 202284139.160.9–22.2
Cadem22–24 Jun 202270239.360.7–21.4
Activa20–24 Jun 20221,00536.064.0–28.0
MORI/FIEL9–24 Jun 20221,00047.053.0–6.0
Signos18–22 Jun 202280340.459.6–19.2
Cadem15–17 Jun 202270344.655.4–10.8
Cadem8–10 Jun 202270247.652.4–4.8
Activa6–10 Jun 20221,24741.558.5–17.0
Cadem2–3 Jun 202270248.351.7–3.4
Criteria27–31 May 20221,05944.355.7–11.4
CEP13 Apr–29 May 20221,35548.151.9–3.8
Data Influye27–29 May 20221,45147.152.9–5.8
Cadem25–27 May 202270445.154.9–9.8
Activa23–27 May 20221,01538.761.3–22.6
Cadem18–20 May 202270844.655.4–10.8
Datavoz11–17 May 20221,33737.362.7–25.4
Cadem11–13 May 202270645.254.8–9.6
Activa10–13 May 20221,01637.362.7–25.4
Black&White9–11 May 2022?38.161.9–23.8
Cadem4–6 May 202270542.257.8–15.6
Data Influye29 Apr–2 May 20221,65144.655.4–10.8
Criteria28 Apr–2 May 20221,64044.355.7–11.4
Cadem27–29 Apr 202270343.956.1–12.2
Activa25–29 Apr 20221,04342.257.8–15.6
La Cosa Nostra9–26 Apr 202260040.859.2–18.4
Studio Publico23–25 Apr 2022?33.766.3–32.6
UDD24 Apr 2022?43.856.2–12.4
Cadem20–22 Apr 202270444.655.4–10.8
Cadem12–14 Apr 202270245.854.2–8.4
Criteria/Zoom12–14 Apr 2022?49.250.8–1.6
Activa11–14 Apr 20221,32646.753.3–6.6
Cadem6–7 Apr 202270747.053.0–6.0
UDD5–6 Apr 20221,00247.852.2–4.4
Criteria31 Mar–4 Apr 202281347.652.4–4.6
Data Influye1–3 Apr 20221,67150.649.4+1.2
Cadem30 Mar–1 Apr 202270746.553.5–7.0
Activa28 Mar–1 Apr 20221,52147.252.8–5.6
Datavoz15–31 Mar 20221,65046.054.0–8.0
Studio Publico25–28 Mar 202291439.460.6–21.2
Cadem23–25 Mar 202270456.143.9+12.2
UDD22–23 Mar 2022?53.146.9+6.5
Activa18–19 Mar 20221,00454.745.3+9.4
Cadem16–18 Mar 202270258.241.8+16.4
Feedback16–18 Mar 20221,80448.251.8–3.6
Cadem9–11 Mar 202270854.545.5+9.0
UDD7–8 Mar 20221,02852.647.4+5.2
Data Influye3–6 Mar 20221,46659.240.8+18.4
Cadem2–4 Mar 202271354.345.7+8.6
Criteria25–28 Feb 202287263.236.8+26.4
Studio Publico22–28 Feb 20221,15841.858.2–16.4
Cadem23–25 Feb 202271259.540.5+19.0
MORI/FIEL5–16 Feb 20221,00067.932.1+35.8
Cadem9–11 Feb 202270655.344.7+10.6
Datavoz22 Jan–7 Feb 20221,41356.143.9+12.2
Studio Publico25–31 Jan 20221,03753.146.9+6.2
UDD30 Jan 2022?62.737.3+25.4
Cadem26–28 Jan 202270762.937.1+25.8
UDD16 Jan 2022?66.733.3+33.4
UDD28 Nov 2021?56.943.1+13.8
UDD14 Nov 2021?57.842.2+15.6

Voting preferences

The table below lists raw, unweighted voting preferences.

Polling firm/CommissionerFieldwork dateSample sizeApproveReject?Lead
2022 Chilean national plebiscite4 Sep 202237.360.62.1–23.3
Cadem31 Aug–2 Sep 20221,415404515–5
UDD17–19 Aug 20228,691394912–10
Cadem17–19 Aug 20221,007374617–9
AtlasIntel16–19 Aug 20222,73539.054.86.2–15.8
Activa16–19 Aug 20222,08932.945.821.3–12.9
Signos14–19 Aug 20221,09542.645.911.5–3.3
Cadem10–12 Aug 20221,015384616–8
Activa10–12 Aug 20221,51433.944.421.7–10.5
Signos7–11 Aug 202272838.243.917.9–5.7
Data Influye5–7 Aug 20221,65043489–5
Cadem3–5 Aug 2022704374716–10
Activa2–5 Aug 20221,22429.944.525.6–14.6
Signos31 Jul–4 Aug 202271538.145.816.1–7.7
MORI/FIEL28 Jul–2 Aug 20221,50044479–3
Criteria29 Jul–1 Aug 20221,000364519–9
Cadem27–29 Jul 2022706384814–10
Signos24–28 Jul 202277837.047.315.7–10.3
Criteria22–26 Jul 20221,512364420–8
Cadem20–22 Jul 2022701394714–8
Activa19–22 Jul 20221,24130.146.023.9–15.9
UDD20–21 Jul 20228,542385012–12
Signos18–21 Jul 202270135.447.816.8–12.4
Cadem13–15 Jul 2022702375211–15
Signos11–14 Jul 202270329.650.719.7–21.1
Cadem6–8 Jul 2022708355312–18
Activa5–8 Jul 20221,20528.046.325.7–18.3
Signos4–7 Jul 202271032.450.117.5–17.7
Feedback4–6 Jul 20222,84234214–18
Data Influye1–4 Jul 20221,555414613–5
Criteria30 Jun–4 Jul 20221,018314821–17
Cadem29 Jun–1 Jul 2022707345115–17
UDD28–29 Jun 20221,044385210–14
Signos26–29 Jun 202284129.946.523.6–16.6
Cadem22–24 Jun 2022702335116–18
Activa20–24 Jun 20221,00525.044.430.6–19.4
MORI/FIEL9–24 Jun 20221,000313534–4
Signos18–22 Jun 202280331.546.522.0–15.0
Cadem15–17 Jun 2022703374617–9
Cadem8–10 Jun 2022702394318–4
Activa6–10 Jun 20221,24729.741.928.4–12.2
Cadem2–3 Jun 2022702424513–3
Criteria27–31 May 20221,059313930–8
CEP13 Apr–29 May 20221,355252748–2
Data Influye27–29 May 20221,451404515–5
Cadem25–27 May 2022704374518–8
Activa23–27 May 20221,01528.545.226.3–16.7
Cadem18–20 May 2022708374617–9
Datavoz11–17 May 20221,337284725–19
Cadem11–13 May 2022706384616–8
Activa10–13 May 20221,01627.145.527.4–18.4
Black&White9–11 May 2022?325217–20
Cadem4–6 May 2022705354817–13
Data Influye29 Apr–2 May 20221,651374617–9
Criteria28 Apr–2 May 20221,640313930–8
Cadem27–29 Apr 2022703364618–10
Activa25–29 Apr 20221,04329.140.530.4–11.4
La Cosa Nostra9–26 Apr 202260040582–18
Studio Publico23–25 Apr 2022?30.459.79.9–29.3
UDD24 Apr 2022?324126–9
Cadem20–22 Apr 2022704374617–9
Cadem12–14 Apr 2022702384517–7
Criteria/Zoom12–14 Apr 2022?313237–1
Activa11–14 Apr 20221,32632.236.831.0–4.6
Cadem6–7 Apr 2022707394417–5
UDD5–6 Apr 20221,002333631–3
Criteria31 Mar–4 Apr 2022813303337–3
Data Influye1–3 Apr 20221,671393823+1
Cadem30 Mar–1 Apr 2022707404614–6
Activa28 Mar–1 Apr 20221,52132.035.832.2–3.8
Datavoz15–31 Mar 20221,65040.948.011.2–7.1
Studio Publico25–28 Mar 202291434.953.611.6–18.7
Cadem23–25 Mar 2022704463618+10
UDD22–23 Mar 2022?433821+6.5
Activa18–19 Mar 20221,00437.731.231.1+6.5
Cadem16–18 Mar 2022702463321+13
Feedback16–18 Mar 20221,804414416–3
Cadem9–11 Mar 2022708423523+7
UDD7–8 Mar 20221,028403624+4
Data Influye3–6 Mar 20221,466453124+14
Cadem2–4 Mar 2022713443719+7
Criteria25–28 Feb 2022872362143+15
Studio Publico22–28 Feb 20221,15834.548.117.5–13.6
Cadem23–25 Feb 2022712473221+15
MORI/FIEL5–16 Feb 20221,000361747+19
Cadem9–11 Feb 2022706473815+9
Datavoz22 Jan–7 Feb 20221,413463617+10
Studio Publico25–31 Jan 20221,03740.535.823.6+4.7
UDD30 Jan 2022?422533+17
Cadem26–28 Jan 2022707563311+33
UDD16 Jan 2022?422137+21
UDD28 Nov 2021?372835+9
UDD14 Nov 2021?372736+10
2020 Chilean national plebiscite25 Oct 202077.921.60.5+56.3

Results

Results
ChoiceVotes%
For4,860,26638.13
Against7,886,43461.87
Total12,746,700100.00
Valid votes12,746,70097.86
Invalid votes200,8121.54
Blank votes77,2800.59
Total votes13,024,792100.00
Registered voters/turnout15,173,92985.84
Source:

Analysis

Celebrations for the triumph of the Rejection of a New Constitution in Chile, 4 September 2022.

Chileans' views on the new constitution changed throughout the process of the Constitutional Convention. When the Constitutional Convention started meeting in August 2021, participants in a national poll were asked if they believed that the new constitution resulting from the process would help solve Chile's problems, have no effect, or worsen the current situation, 49% said it would have a positive effect, and 15% said it would have a negative effect. By May 2022, 36% of Chileans said that they believed the new constitution would have a positive effect, a drop from the previous poll. In a study carried out by the independent think tank Espacio Público-IPSOS in July 2022, 38% of respondents believed that the new constitution would bring about several negative changes for the country, while 23% believed it would bring positive changes.

Doubts about the representativeness of the Constitutional Convention's members may have led to its rejection. Respondents to Espacio Público-IPSOS' survey felt the members of the Constitutional Convention were unrepresentative of Chileans as a whole; 59% of respondents said they did not believe the composition of the Constitutional Convention was a good representation of the diversity of Chilean society, and 63% of respondents said they did not feel represented by the Constitutional Convention.

Chileans were also skeptical of particular elements of the new constitution. The indigenous justice system, the plurinational state, and the role of Congress created the most concern. The language of the new constitution declared, "Chile is a Plurinational and Intercultural State that recognizes the coexistence of diverse nations and peoples within the framework of the unity of the State." Regarding an indigenous justice system, the new constitution also declared that "pre-existing indigenous peoples and nations, as well as their members, are entitled to the full exercise of their collective and individual rights by virtue of their self-determination". These new elements generated fears about internal divisions and competing sources of justice to the generally centrist Chilean citizenry. Participants believed that the new constitution would worsen the sale and consumption of drugs, unemployment, poverty and political corruption.

Aftermath

Boric announced a new process for drafting a new constitution, with Al Jazeera writing, "Most Chileans and their politicians have agreed the constitution that dates from the dictatorship must change." Boric called on the heads of all political parties for a meeting on Monday, 5 September 2022, to chart a path forward. As a result of the rejection, the incumbent 1980 Constitution will remain in force, with The Guardian writing that "Chile's future looks decidedly uncertain," and that, "Boric has expressed a willingness to repeat the constitutional process, but the basis for reform is still very much up for debate." Colombian president Gustavo Petro lamented the win of the rejection vote, considering that Chile had decided to "revive Augusto Pinochet".

The Economist considered that "common sense" had led Chileans to reject the proposed constitution and called the result a "blow" for the recently elected government of Gabriel Boric.

In the aftermath of the plebiscite the internal division that the Christian Democratic Party's official support for the "Approve" option had created resurfaced, with various calls for a renewed leadership, and some calling for the expulsion of members who had supported the "Reject" option.

A Constitutional Council election was held on 7 May 2023, with right-wing parties gaining a majority. Its proposed new constitution was subsequently also rejected in another constitutional referendum held on 17 December 2023.

See also

Opinion poll sources

Other

External links

Media related to Chilean constitutional plebiscite, 2022 at Wikimedia Commons