The foundry model is a microelectronics engineering and manufacturing business model consisting of a semiconductor fabrication plant, or foundry, and an integrated circuit design operation, each belonging to separate companies or subsidiaries. It was first conceived by Morris Chang, the founder of the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC).

Integrated device manufacturers (IDMs) design and manufacture integrated circuits. Many companies, known as fabless semiconductor companies, only design devices; merchant or pure play foundries only manufacture devices for other companies, without designing them. Examples of IDMs are Intel, Samsung, and Texas Instruments, examples of pure play foundries are GlobalFoundries, TSMC, and UMC, and examples of fabless companies are AMD, Nvidia, and Qualcomm.[citation needed]

Integrated circuit production facilities are expensive to build and maintain. Unless they can be kept at nearly full use, they will become a drain on the finances of the company that owns them. The foundry model uses two methods to avoid these costs: fabless companies avoid costs by not owning such facilities. Merchant foundries, on the other hand, find work from the worldwide pool of fabless companies, through careful scheduling, pricing, and contracting, keep their plants in full use.[citation needed]

History

Companies that both designed and produced the devices were originally responsible for manufacturing microelectronic devices. These manufacturers were involved in both the research and development of manufacturing processes and the research and development of microcircuit design.

The first pure play semiconductor company is the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation founded by Morris Chang, a spin-off of the government Industrial Technology Research Institute, which split its design and fabrication divisions in 1987, a model advocated for by Carver Mead in the U.S., but deemed too costly to pursue. The separation of design and fabrication became known as the foundry model, with fabless manufacturing outsourcing to semiconductor foundries.

Fabless semiconductor companies do not have any semiconductor fabrication capability, instead contracting with a merchant foundry for fabrication. The fabless company concentrates on the research and development of an IC-product; the foundry concentrates on manufacturing and testing the physical product. If the foundry does not have any semiconductor design capability, it is a pure-play semiconductor foundry.

An absolute separation into fabless and foundry companies is not necessary. Many companies continue to exist that perform both operations and benefit from the close coupling of their skills. Some companies manufacture some of their own designs and contract out to have others manufactured or designed, in cases where they see value or seek special skills. The foundry model is a business model that seeks to optimize productivity.

MOSIS

The very first merchant foundries were part of the MOSIS service. The MOSIS service gave limited production access to designers with limited means, such as students, university researchers, and engineers at small startups. The designer submitted designs, and these submissions were manufactured with the commercial company's extra capacity. Manufacturers could insert some wafers for a MOSIS design into a collection of their own wafers when a processing step was compatible with both operations. The commercial company (serving as foundry) was already running the process, so they were effectively being paid by MOSIS for something they were already doing. A factory with excess capacity during slow periods could also run MOSIS designs to avoid having expensive capital equipment stand idle.

Under-use of an expensive manufacturing plant could lead to the financial ruin of the owner, so selling surplus wafer capacity was a way to maximize the fab's use. Hence, economic factors created a climate where fab operators wanted to sell surplus wafer-manufacturing capacity and designers wanted to purchase manufacturing capacity rather than try to build it.

Although MOSIS opened the doors to some fabless customers, earning additional revenue for the foundry and providing inexpensive service to the customer, running a business around MOSIS production was difficult. The merchant foundries sold wafer capacity on a surplus basis, as a secondary business activity. Services to the customers were secondary to the commercial business, with little guarantee of support. The choice of merchant dictated the design, development flow, and available techniques to the fabless customer. Merchant foundries might require proprietary and non-portable preparation steps. Foundries concerned with protecting what they considered trade secrets of their methodologies might only be willing to release data to designers after an onerous nondisclosure procedure.

Dedicated foundry

In 1987, the world's first dedicated merchant foundry opened its doors: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC). The distinction of 'dedicated' is in reference to the typical merchant foundry of the era, whose primary business activity was building and selling of its own IC-products. The dedicated foundry offers several key advantages to its customers: first, it does not sell finished IC-products into the supply channel; thus a dedicated foundry will never compete directly with its fabless customers (obviating a common concern of fabless companies). Second, the dedicated foundry can scale production capacity to a customer's needs, offering low-quantity shuttle services in addition to full-scale production lines. Finally, the dedicated foundry offers a "COT-flow" (customer owned tooling) based on industry-standard EDA systems, whereas many IDM merchants required its customers to use proprietary (non-portable) development tools. The COT advantage gave the customer complete control over the design process, from concept to final design.

Foundry sales leaders by year

  • Pure-play semiconductor foundry is a company that does not offer a significant amount of IC products of its own design, but instead operates semiconductor fabrication plants focused on producing ICs for other companies.
  • Integrated device manufacturer (IDM) semiconductor foundry is where companies such as Texas Instruments, IBM, and Samsung join in to provide foundry services as long as there is no conflict of interest between relevant parties.

2023

As of 2023, the top semiconductor foundries were:
RankCompanyFoundry typeCountry/Territory of originRevenue (million USD)
2023Q4 2023Q3 2023
1TSMCPure-playTaiwan19,66017,249
2Samsung SemiconductorIDMKorea3,6193,690
3GlobalFoundriesPure-playUnited States1,8541,852
4UMCPure-playTaiwan1,7271,801
5SMICPure-playChina1,6781,620
6Hua Hong SemiconductorPure-playChina657766
7Tower SemiconductorPure-playIsrael352358
8PowerChipIDMTaiwan330305
9NexchipPure-playChina308283
10Vanguard (VIS)Pure-playTaiwan304333

2017

As of 2017, the top semiconductor foundries were:
RankCompanyFoundry typeCountry/Territory of originRevenue (million USD)
201720172016
1TSMCPure-playTaiwan32,04029,437
2GlobalFoundriesPure-playUnited States5,4074,999
3UMCPure-playTaiwan4,8984,587
4Samsung SemiconductorIDMKorea7,3984,284
5SMICPure-playChina3,0992,914
6TowerJazzPure-playIsrael1,3881,249
7PowerChipIDMTaiwan1,035870
8Vanguard (VIS)Pure-playTaiwan817801
9Hua Hong SemiconductorPure-playChina807721
10Dongbu HiTekPure-playKorea676666

2016–2014

As of 2016, the top pure-play semiconductor foundries were:
RankCompanyFoundry typeCountry/Territory of originRevenue (million USD)
20162015201620152014
11TSMCPure-playTaiwan29,48825,57425,138
22GlobalFoundriesPure-playUnited States5,5455,0194,355
33UMCPure-playTaiwan4,5824,4644,331
44SMICPure-playChina2,9212,2361,970
55PowerChipPure-playTaiwan1,2751,2681,291
66TowerJazzPure-playIsrael1,249961828
88Vanguard (VIS)Pure-playTaiwan800736790
99Hua Hong SemiPure-playChina712650665
1010Dongbu HiTekPure-playKorea672593541
1112X-FabPure-playGermany510331330
OthersPure-play2,2512,4052,280

2013

As of 2013, the top 13 semiconductor foundries were:
2013 Rank2012 RankCompanyFoundry TypeCountry/Territory of originRevenue (million $USD)
11TSMCPure-playTaiwan19,850
22GlobalFoundriesPure-playUnited States4,261
33UMCPure-playTaiwan3,959
44Samsung SemiconductorIDMKorea3,950
55SMICPure-playChina1,973
78PowerChipPure-playTaiwan1,175
89Vanguard (VIS)Pure-playTaiwan713
96Huahong GracePure-playChina710
1010DongbuPure-playKorea570
117TowerJazzPure-playIsrael509
1211IBMIDMUnited States485
1312MagnaChipIDMKorea411
1413Win SemiconductorsPure-playTaiwan354

2011

As of 2011, the top 14 semiconductor foundries were:
RankCompanyFoundry typeCountry/Territory of originRevenue (million USD)
1TSMCPure-playTaiwan14,600
2UMCPure-playTaiwan3,760
3GlobalFoundriesPure-playUnited States3,580
4Samsung SemiconductorIDMKorea1,975
5SMICPure-playChina1,315
6TowerJazzPure-playIsrael610
7Vanguard (VIS)Pure-playTaiwan519
8Dongbu HiTekPure-playKorea500
9IBMIDMUnited States445
10MagnaChipIDMKorea350
11SSMCPure-playSingapore345
12Hua Hong NECPure-playChina335
13Win SemiconductorsPure-playTaiwan300
14X-FabPure-playGermany285

2010

As of 2010, the top 10 semiconductor foundries were:
RankCompanyFoundry TypeCountry/Territory of originRevenue (million USD)
1TSMCPure-playTaiwan13,332
2UMCPure-playTaiwan3,824
3GlobalFoundriesPure-playUnited States3,520
4SMICPure-playChina1,554
5Dongbu HiTekPure-playKorea512
6TowerJazzPure-playIsrael509
7Vanguard (VIS)Pure-playTaiwan505
8IBMIDMUnited States500
9MagnaChipIDMKorea410
10Samsung SemiconductorIDMKorea390

2009–2007

As of 2009, the top 17 semiconductor foundries were:

RankCompanyFoundry typeCountry/Territory of originRevenue (million USD)
2009200920082007
1TSMCPure-playTaiwan8,98910,5569,813
2UMCPure-playTaiwan2,8153,0703,430
3Chartered(1)Pure-playSingapore1,5401,7431,458
4GlobalFoundriesPure-playUSA1,10100
5SMICPure-playChina1,0751,3531,550
6DongbuPure-playSouth Korea395490510
7VanguardPure-playTaiwan382511486
8IBMIDMUSA335400570
9SamsungIDMSouth Korea325370355
10GracePure-playChina310335310
11HeJianPure-playChina305345330
12Tower SemiconductorPure-playIsrael292252231
13HHNECPure-playChina290350335
14SSMCPure-playSingapore280340359
15Texas InstrumentsIDMUSA250315450
16X-FabPure-playGermany223368410
17MagnaChipIDMSouth Korea220290322

(1) Now acquired by GlobalFoundries

2008–2006

As of 2008, the top 18 pure-play semiconductor foundries were:

RankCompanyCountry/Territory of originRevenue (million USD)
2008200820072006
1TSMCTaiwan10,5569,8139,748
2UMCTaiwan3,4003,7553,670
3CharteredSingapore1,7431,4581,527
4SMICChina1,3541,5501,465
5VanguardTaiwan511486398
6DongbuSouth Korea490510456
7X-FabGermany400410290
8HHNECChina350335315
9HeJianChina345330290
10SSMCSingapore340350325
11GraceChina335310227
12Tower SemiconductorIsrael252231187
13Jazz SemiconductorUnited States190182213
14SilterraMalaysia175180155
15ASMCChina149155170
16Polar SemiconductorJapan11010595
17Mosel-VitelicTaiwan100105155
18CR Micro (1)China-143114
Others140167180
Total20,98020,57519,940

(1) Merged with CR Logic in 2008, reclassified as an IDM foundry

2007–2005

As of 2007, the top 14 semiconductor foundries include:

RankCompanyFoundry typeCountry/Territory of originRevenue (million USD)
2007200720062005
1TSMCPure-PlayTaiwan9,8139,7488,217
2UMCPure-PlayTaiwan3,7553,6703,259
3SMICPure-PlayChina1,5501,4651,171
4CharteredPure-PlaySingapore1,4581,5271,132
5Texas InstrumentsIDMUnited States610585540
6IBMIDMUnited States570600665
7DongbuPure-PlaySouth Korea510456347
8VanguardPure-PlayTaiwan486398353
9X-FabPure-PlayGermany410290202
10SamsungIDMSouth Korea38575-
11SSMCPure-PlaySingapore350325280
12HHNECPure-PlayChina335315313
13HeJianPure-PlayChina330290250
14MagnaChipIDMSouth Korea322342345

For ranking in worldwide:

RankCompanyCountry/Territory of originRevenue (million USD)2006/2005 changes
2006200520062005
67TSMCTaiwan9,7488,217+19%
2122UMCTaiwan3,6703,259+13%

2004

As of 2004, the top 10 pure-play semiconductor foundries were: [citation needed]

Rank 2004CompanyCountry/Territory of origin
1TSMCTaiwan
2UMCTaiwan
3CharteredSingapore
4SMICChina
5Dongbu/AnamSouth Korea
6SSMCSingapore
7HHNECChina
8Jazz SemiconductorUnited States
9SilterraMalaysia
10X-FabGermany

Financial and IP issues

Like all industries, the semiconductor industry faces upcoming challenges and obstacles.

The cost to stay on the leading edge has steadily increased with each generation of chips. The financial strain is being felt by both large merchant foundries and their fabless customers. The cost of a new foundry exceeds $1 billion. These costs must be passed on to customers. Many merchant foundries have entered into joint ventures with their competitors in an effort to split research and design expenditures and fab-maintenance expenses.

Chip design companies sometimes avoid other companies' patents simply by purchasing the products from a licensed foundry with broad cross-license agreements with the patent owner.

Stolen design data is also a concern; data is rarely directly copied, because blatant copies are easily identified by distinctive features in the chip, placed there either for this purpose or as a byproduct of the design process. However, the data including any procedure, process system, method of operation or concept may be sold to a competitor, who may save months or years of tedious reverse engineering.

See also

External links