The iGEM (International Genetically Engineered Machine) competition is a worldwide synthetic biology competition that was initially aimed at undergraduate and 'overgraduate' university students, but has since expanded to include divisions for high school students, entrepreneurs, and community laboratories. iGEM is presented as "the heart of synthetic biology" - educating the next generation of leaders and workforce of the field. Since its inception in 2003, over 100 000 students from over 66 countries have been trained in the responsible, safe and secure use of synthetic biology.

The iGEM Competition is a flagship program of the iGEM Foundation - an independent, non-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of synthetic biology, education and competition, and the development of an open, collaborative, and cooperative community. Aside from the competition, iGEM has established many initiatives and programs to support the future growth of synthetic biology throughout the world: iGEM Community, iGEM Technology, iGEM Responsibility, iGEM Startups, and iGEM Leagues.

Competition details

Student teams are given a kit (so called ‘Distribution Kit’) of standard, interchangeable parts (so called 'BioBricks') at the beginning of the summer from the Registry of Standard Biological Parts comprising various genetic components such as promoters, terminators, reporter elements, and plasmid backbones. Working at their local laboratories over the summer, they use these parts and new parts of their own design to build biological systems and operate them in living cells.

The teams are free to choose a project, which can build on previous projects or be new to iGEM. Successful projects produce cells that exhibit new and unusual properties by engineering sets of multiple genes together with mechanisms to regulate their expression.

At the end of the summer, the teams add their new BioBricks to the Parts Registry and the scientific community can build upon the expanded set of BioBricks in the next year.

At the annual ‘iGEM Jamboree’ teams from all continents meet in Paris for a scientific expo event and conference where they present their projects to each other and to a scientific jury of ~400 judges. The judges award medals and special prizes to the teams and select a ‘Grand Prize Winner’ team as well as ‘Runner-Up’ teams in each division (High School, Undergraduate and Overgraduate).

Awards & Judging in the iGEM competition

Each participant receives a participating certificate (see fig. below) and has the possibility to earn medals (bronze, silver and gold; see fig. below) with their team depending on different criteria that the team fulfilled in the competitions. For a bronze medal it is for example necessary to submit a new part to the Parts Registry, for a silver medal the team is required to document the functionality of a part and for a gold medal it is finally, among other criteria, necessary to obtain a proof-of-principle for the team's project.

In 2016 as an example, 300 teams participated in the competition from which 37% received a gold medal, 25% a silver medal, 26% a bronze medal and 12% were not awarded a medal.

In each division, the best performance in a certain aspect of the competition is honored with special prizes. The special prizes include: 'Best Project' in the respective categories (app. 10 categories), 'Best Art & Design', 'Best Hardware', 'Best Measurement', 'Best Software', 'Best Human Practices', 'Best Model', 'Best New Part', 'Best Poster', 'Best Presentation', 'Best Wiki' and others depending on the competition year. Together with individual certificates, the teams are given glass trophies for each special prize (see fig. below).

From all teams in a respective division, a number of finalists are selected (1 to 6, depending on year and division) and allowed to present their project again in front of all Jamboree participants. From the presented projects all judges select the winner of this year's iGEM competition, the Grand Prize Winner team, who are then awarded a big metal Lego-brick (see fig. below). The winning team may keep this challenge trophy for a year until it gets awarded to the next 'Grand Prize Winner'. Participants of a 'Grand Prize Winner' team are also given challenge coins of the respective year (see fig. below).

  • Participant's certificate
  • Gold medal sticker

History of the competition

Growth of the annual iGEM Jamboree
YearNo. of participants
200431(5 teams)
2005125(13 teams)
2006723(32 teams)
2007777(54 teams)
20081,248(88 teams)
20091,840(113 teams)
20102,327(128 teams)
20112,586(165 teams)
20123,696(190 teams)
20134,027(215 teams)
20144,515(245 teams)
20155,018(280 teams)
20164,432(300 teams)
20175,386(310 teams)
20185,790(340 teams)
20196,375(353 teams)
20204,800(249 teams)
20217,314(350 teams)
20227,757(356 teams)
20238,541(390 teams)
20249,507(410 teams)

iGEM developed out of student projects conducted during MIT's Independent Activities Periods in 2003 and 2004 led by Tom Knight, Drew Endy and Randy Rettberg. Later in 2004, a competition with five teams from various schools was held. In 2005, teams from outside the United States took part for the first time. Since then iGEM has continued to grow, with 130 teams entering in 2010. Randy Rettberg, an engineer who has worked for technology companies including Apple, Sun and BBN, is the founder and president of iGEM.

Because of this increasing size, in the years 2011 - 2013 the competition was split into three regions: Europe, the Americas, and Asia (though teams from Africa and Australia also entered via "Europe" and "Asia" respectively). Regional jamborees occurred during October; and some subset of teams attending those events were selected to advance to the World Championship at MIT in November.

In January 2012 the iGEM Foundation was spun out of MIT as an independent non-profit organization located in Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. The iGEM Foundation supports scientific research and education through operating the iGEM competition. The same year, iGEM expanded into having not only the Collegiate division, but also competitions for entrepreneurs and high school students.

For their tenth anniversary, iGEM added new tracks to the existing ones: Art & Design, Community Labs, Entrepreneurship, Measurement, Microfluidics, Policy & Practice, and Software. Although Entrepreneurship and Software were tracks in previous years, in 2014 they were made more distinct in terms of their judging requirements. Furthermore, in 2014 iGEM did not have regional jamborees, but instead hosted a giant jamboree so every team could participate in one conference in Cambridge unlike in previous years where only the regional finalists were brought to Cambridge.

The iGEM Jamborees for 2020 and 2021 were held online, due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Starting in 2022, the event was redesigned and rebranded to the iGEM Grand Jamboree, held in the Paris Expo Porte de Versailles.

Broader goals

Beyond just building biological systems, broader goals of iGEM include:

  • To enable the systematic engineering of biology.
  • To promote the open and transparent development of tools for engineering biology.
  • And to help construct a society that can productively and safely apply biological technology.

iGEM's dual aspects of self-organization and imaginative manipulation of genetic material have demonstrated a new way to arouse student interest in modern biology and to develop their independent learning skills.

Competition Results

Best iGEM Medal by Country - All Divisions as of November 2024.Gold Medal Silver Medal Bronze Medal

High School Division

Grand Prize Winners by Country - High School (as of November 2024).1 Title 2 Titles 3 Titles 4 Titles 5 Titles
Top High School Teams by Year
Grand Prize2nd3rdComplete Results
2025GreatBay-SCIE ChinaUprize-I China
2024GEMS-Taiwan Chinese TaipeiGreatBay-Scie China
2023Japan-United JapanBASIS-China China
2022Lambert_GA United StatesPuiChing_Macau Macau
2021LINKS_China ChinaSZ_SHD China
2020TAS Taipei Chinese TaipeiGreatBay SCIE China
2019GreatBay SZ China[permanent dead link]
2018GreatBay China China[permanent dead link]
2017TAS Taipei Chinese Taipei
2016HSiTAIWAN Chinese Taipei
2015TAS Taipei Chinese Taipei
2014CSIA-SouthKorea South KoreaTP CC-SanDiego United StatesTAS TaipeiChinese Taipei
2013Lethbridge Canada CanadaAUC Turkey TurkeyCIDEB-UANL Mexico Mexico
2012Heidelberg LSL GermanyNC School of Sci Math United StatesCIDEB-UANL Mexico Mexico
2011Years prior to 2012 had no separate high school division.

High School Ranking by Country

CountryGrand PrizeRunners-upTop 2 Total
Taiwan505
China459
United States123
Canada101
Germany101
Japan101
South Korea101
Macao011
Turkey011

Undergraduate Division

Grand Prize Winners by Country/Region - Undergrad (as of November 2024).1 Title 2 Titles 3 Titles
Top Undergraduate Teams by Year
Grand Prize2nd3rdComplete Results
2025McGill CanadaEPFL SwitzerlandIZJU-China China
2024Heidelberg GermanyJU-Krakow PolandSydney-Australia Australia
2023McGill CanadaVilnius-Lithuania LithuaniaNUS-Singapore Singapore
2022TU-Eindhoven NetherlandsINSA_Lyon1 FranceHKUST Hong Kong
2021Toulouse INSA-UPS FranceNUS-Singapore SingaporeShanghai Tech China China
2020Vilnius-Lithuania LithuaniaToulouse INSA-UPS FranceXMU China China
2019NCKU Tainan Chinese TaipeiCalgary CanadaTU Kaiserslautern Germany[permanent dead link]
2018Valencia SpainUC San Diego United StatesSZU-China China[permanent dead link]
2017Vilnius-Lithuania LithuaniaWilliam and Mary United StatesHeidelberg Germany
2016Imperial United KingdomSydney Australia AustraliaSCAU-China China
2015William and Mary United StatesCzech Republic Czech RepublicHeidelberg Germany
2014Heidelberg GermanyImperial United KingdomNCTU Formosa Chinese Taipei
2013Heidelberg GermanyTU Munich GermanyImperial United Kingdom
2012Groningen NetherlandsLjubljana SloveniaParis Bettencourt FranceLMU Munich Germany
2011Washington United StatesImperial United KingdomZJU Chin a ChinaMIT United States
2010Ljubljana SloveniaPeking ChinaBCCS Bristol United KingdomCambridge United KingdomImperial United KingdomTU Delft NetherlandsDeprecated link archived 2013-01-12 at archive.today
2009Cambridge United KingdomHeidelberg GermanyValencia SpainFreiburg GermanyGroningen NetherlandsImperial United KingdomDeprecated link archived 2013-01-13 at archive.today
2008Ljubljana SloveniaFreiburg GermanyCaltech United StatesHarvard United StatesNYMU Taipei Chinese TaipeiUC Berkeley United States
2007Peking ChinaParis FranceLjubljana SloveniaUC Berkeley United StatesUCSF United StatesUSTC China
2006Ljubljana SloveniaImperial United KingdomPrinceton United States
2005Years prior to 2006 had no specific winners.
2004,
2003

Undergraduate Ranking by Country

CountryGrand PrizeRunners-up2nd Runners-UpTop 3 Total
Germany3339
Slovenia3115
United Kingdom2327
United States2226
Lithuania2103
Netherlands2002
France1315
China1168
Canada2103
Chinese Taipei1012
Spain1012
Australia0112
Singapore0112
Czech Republic0101
Poland0101
Hong Kong0011
Switzerland0101

Overgraduate Division

Grand Prize Winners by Country/Region - Overgrad (as of November 2024).1 Title 2 Titles 3 Titles 4 Titles
Top Overgraduate Teams by Year
Grand Prize2nd3rdComplete Results
2025Brno Czech RepublicHeidelberg Germany
2024Marburg GermanyAachen Germany
2023Estonia-TUIT EstoniaLeiden Netherlands
2022UCopenhagen DenmarkMontpellier France
2021MarburgGermanyTU Delft Netherlands
2020Leiden NetherlandsAachenGermany
2019EPFL SwitzerlandWageningen UR Netherlands
2018Marburg GermanyMunich Germany[permanent dead link]
2017TU Delft NetherlandsMunich Germany
2016Munich GermanyWageningen UR Netherlands
2015TU Delft NetherlandsBGU Israel Israel
2014UC Davis United StatesWageningen NetherlandsTU Darmstadt Germany
2013Paris Bettencourt FranceBielefeld GermanySun Yat-sen China
2012Years prior to 2013 had no separate overgraduate division.

Overgraduate Ranking by Country

CountryGrand PrizeRunners-upTop 2 Total
Germany4610
Netherlands358
France112
Czech101
Denmark101
Estonia101
Switzerland101
United States101
Israel011

Notes

Further reading

  • Mooallem, Jon (2010-02-14). . New York Times.
  • . New Yorker. 2009-09-28.
  • . Wellcome Trust. Archived from on December 2, 2010.
  • Guan, Zheng-jun; Schmidt, Markus; Pei, Lei; Wei, Wei; Ma, Ke-Ping (2013). . BioScience. 63: 25–34. doi:.

External links