In India, President's rule is the suspension of state government and imposition of direct Union government rule in a state. Under Article 356 of the Constitution of India, if a state government is unable to function according to Constitutional provisions, the Union government can take direct control of the state machinery. Subsequently, executive authority is exercised through the centrally appointed governor, who has the authority to appoint other administrators to assist them. The administrators are usually nonpartisan retired civil servants not native to the state.

When a state government is functioning correctly, it is run by an elected Council of Ministers responsible to the state's legislative assembly (Vidhan Sabha). The council is led by the chief minister, who is the chief executive of the state; the Governor is only a constitutional head. However, during President's rule, the Council of Ministers is dissolved, later on vacating the office of Chief Minister. Furthermore, the Vidhan Sabha is either prorogued or dissolved, necessitating a new election.

Prior to 2019, the constitution of the state of Jammu and Kashmir had a similar system of Governor's rule, under its Section 92. The state's governor issued a proclamation, after obtaining the consent of the President of India allowing Governor's rule for up to six months after which President's rule under Article 356 of the Constitution of India could be imposed. After the revocation of Article 370, President's rule applies to Jammu and Kashmir under section 73 (since Article 356 of Constitution of India does not apply to union territories) of Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019.

Following the 1994 landmark judgment in S. R. Bommai v. Union of India, the Supreme Court of India restricted arbitrary impositions of President's rule.

Chhattisgarh and Telangana are the only states where the President's rule has never been imposed so far.

Imposition in state

In practice, President's rule has been imposed in a State under any one of the following different circumstances:

  • A state Assembly is unable to elect a leader as Chief Minister for a time prescribed by the Governor of that State, at the Will of Governor.
  • Breakdown of a coalition leading to the Chief Minister not having majority support in the Assembly; and the Chief minister fails/will definitely fail to prove otherwise, within a time prescribed by the Governor of that state.
  • Loss of majority in the Assembly due to a vote of no-confidence in the house.
  • Elections postponed for unavoidable reasons like war, epidemic, pandemic or natural disasters.
  • On the report of the Governor of the State that the State's constitutional machinery or legislature fails to abide by Constitutional norms.

If approved by both Houses, President's rule can continue for 6 months. It can be extended for a maximum of 3 years with the approval of the Parliament done every 6 months; however in extreme rare cases it can be extended repeatedly if the Election Commission of India recommends that elections are not possible. If the Lok Sabha is dissolved during this time, the rule is valid for 30 days from the first sitting of the new Lok Sabha provided that this continuance has already been approved by Rajya Sabha. The 44th Amendment Act of 1978 introduced a new provision to put a restraint on the power of Parliament to extend the President's rule in a state. According to this provision, the president's rule can only be extended over a year, under the following conditions:

  • There is already a national emergency throughout India, or in the whole or any part of the state.
  • The Election Commission certifies that elections cannot be conducted in the state.

President's rule can be revoked at any time by the President and does not need Parliament's approval.

Until the mid-1990s, President's rule was often imposed in states through the abuse of authority of Governors who were in collusion with the Union government. The Supreme Court of India in March 1994 established a precedent in S. R. Bommai v. Union of India, due to which such abuse has been drastically reduced.

Imposition in Union territories with a Legislative Assembly

Article 356 is not applicable to Union territories, so there are many ways by which President's rule can be imposed in different Union territories with a Legislative Assembly.

Jammu and Kashmir

Until the revocation of special status and bifurcation into two Union territories, President's rule applied after the application of Governor's rule under the erstwhile state's constitution for 6 months.

After the revocation and bifurcation, the reorganized union territory of Jammu and Kashmir is subject to the section 73 of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019, which is used to impose President's rule as the Article 356 is not applicable to Union Territories. The provision states:

73. If the President, on receipt of a report from the Lieutenant Governor of Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir, or otherwise, is satisfied,—(a) that a situation has arisen in which the administration of the Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of this Act, or(b) that for the proper administration of Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir it is necessary or expedient so to do,the President may, by order, suspend the operation of all or any of the provisions of this Act for such period as he thinks fit and makes such incidental and consequential provisions asmay appear to him to be necessary or expedient for administering the Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir in accordance with the provisions of this Act.

Delhi

In NCT of Delhi, President's rule is applied on the basis of Article 239AB of the Constitution of India (as the Article 356 is not applicable to Union Territories) which reads thus:

239AB. – If the President, on receipt of a report from the Lieutenant Governor or otherwise, is satisfied—(a) that a situation has arisen in which the administration of the National Capital Territory cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of article 239AA or of any law made in pursuance of that article; or(b) that for the proper administration of the National Capital Territory it is necessary or expedient so to do, the President may by order suspend the operation of any provision of Article 239AA or of all or any of theprovisions of any law made in pursuance of that article for such period and subject to such conditions as maybe specified in such law and make such incidental and consequential provisions as may appear to him to be necessary or expedient for administering the National Capital Territory in accordance with the provisions of article 239 and article 239AA.

Puducherry

In the union territory of Puducherry, President's rule is applied on the basis of Article 51 of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963. Which thus reads

51. Provision in case of failure of constitutional machinery. — If the President, on receipt of a report from the Administrator of the Union territory or otherwise, is satisfied,―(a) that a situation has arisen in which the administration of the Union territory cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of this Act, or(b) that for the proper administration of the Union territory it is necessary or expedient so to do, the President may, by order, suspend the operation of all or any of the provisions of this Act for such period as he thinks fit and make such incidental and consequential provisions as may appear to him to be necessary or expedient for administering the Union territory in accordance with the provisions of article 239.

Misuse and criticism

Article 356 gives wide powers to the Union government to assert its authority over a state if civil unrest occurs and the state government does not have the means to end it. Though the purpose of this article is to give more powers to the Union government to preserve the unity and integrity of the nation, it has often been misused by the ruling parties at the centre, who used it as a pretext to dissolve state governments ruled by political opponents. Thus, it is seen by many as a threat to the federal state system. Since the adoption of the Indian constitution in 1950, the Union government has used this 134 times to dissolve elected state governments by imposing President's rule.

The article was used for the first time in Punjab on 20 June 1951. It was next used in the state of Patiala and East Punjab States Union (PEPSU) in 1953, and then in 1959 to dismiss the Communist Party of India–led government in Kerala in the aftermath of anti-communist protests. In the 1970s and 1980s, it was common for the Union government to dismiss state governments led by opposition parties. The Indira Gandhi regime and post-emergency Janata Party were noted for this practice. Indira Gandhi's government between 1966 and 1977 is known to have imposed President's rule 39 times in different states. Similarly, the Janata Party which came to power after the emergency issued President's rule in 9 states which were ruled by Congress.

The practice was limited only after the Supreme Court established strict guidelines for imposing President's rule in its ruling on the S. R. Bommai v. Union of India case in 1994. This landmark judgement has helped curtail the widespread abuse of Article 356. The judgement established strict guidelines for imposing President's rule. Subsequent pronouncements by the Supreme Court in Jharkhand and other states have further limited the scope for misuse of Article 356. Only since the early 2000s has the number of cases of imposition of President's rule has been drastically reduced.

Article 356 has always been the focal point of a wider debate of the federal structure of government in Indian polity. During debates in the Constituent Assembly of India regarding emergency provisions of the Constitution of India, B. R. Ambedkar argued for their inclusion under the assumption "that such articles will never be called into operation and that they would remain a dead letter". The Sarkaria Commission Report on Centre-State Relations 1983 has recommended that Article 356 must be used "very sparingly, in extreme cases, as a measure of last resort, when all the other alternatives fail to prevent or rectify a breakdown of Constitutional machinery in the state".

List of instances

List of instances of President's rule being applied
StateTermDate of impositionDate of revocationDurationReason(s) to impose the President's rule
Andhra Pradesh118 January 197310 December 1973327 daysBreakdown of law & order due to Jai Andhra Agitation, in CM P. V. Narasimha Rao's tenure.
21 March 20148 June 201499 daysPolitical impasse following the resignation of CM Kiran Kumar Reddy and several other congress party legislators from the Government as well as the Party, in protest against Indian Parliament passing Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Bill to bifurcate united Andhra Pradesh and create a separate Telangana state. President's rule revoked from Telangana areas on 2 June 2014 and bifurcated Andhra Pradesh areas on 8 June 2014. President rule reimposed unlawfully by the President after the two months time limit without taking approval of the Parliament under Article 356.
Andhra State115 November 195428 March 1955133 daysLoss of majority.
Arunachal Pradesh13 November 197918 January 198076 daysLoss of majority following defections in a fluid political environment during Janata party rule at the centre.
225 January 201619 February 201626 days21 Congress MLAs joined hands with 11 of the BJP and two Independents, making the contemporary government a minority. Supreme Court declared the imposition of president rule as ultra vires and reinstated the dismissed Congress led government in the state. In a landmark judgement, it found fault with the unconstitutional role played by the Governor by interfering in the activities of legislatures and speaker of the Vidhan Sabha
Assam112 December 19796 December 1980360 days'Assam Agitation' against illegal foreign nationals staying in Assam started to take roots under the leadership of the All Assam Students' Union (AASU). The violence fuelled by United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA) resulted in breakdown of law and order.
230 June 198113 January 1982197 daysCongress (I) government led by Anwara Taimur representing immigrant minorities collapsed following intensification of 'Assam Agitation' against illegal foreign national staying in Assam.
319 March 198227 February 1983345 daysCongress (I) government led by Kesab Gogoi representing ethnic Asom people collapsed following continued violence in Assam.
428 November 199030 June 1991214 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of AGP CM Prafulla Mahanta enjoying majority support in Assembly. The dismissal was triggered apparently by the threat to internal security due to banned organisation ULFA's activities. During the president's rule, Operation Bajrang was launched to flush out ULFA militants.
Bihar129 June 196826 February 1969242 daysLoss of majority following defections in a fluid political environment.
24 July 196916 February 1970227 daysLoss of majority following defections in a fluid political environment due to split in ruling Congress party
39 January 197219 March 197270 daysLoss of majority following defections in a fluid political environment.
430 April 197724 June 197755 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of Jagannath Mishra enjoying majority support in Assembly.
517 February 19808 June 1980112 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of Ram Sundar Das enjoying majority support in Assembly.
628 March 19954 April 19957 daysPresident's rule imposed for a brief period of one week to facilitate passage of vote on account (to permit day-to-day government expenses in Bihar) by Parliament while awaiting the results of Assembly elections held during the Chief Ministership of Lalu Prasad.
712 February 19998 March 199924 daysBreakdown of law and order, killings of 11 Dalits at Narayanpur. The Vajpayee Government, revoked the president's rule within 26 days since the coalition did not have a majority in the Rajya Sabha.
87 March 200524 November 2005262 daysIndecisive outcome of elections. In a landmark judgement, Supreme Court ruled that the imposition of the president's rule without giving the chance to the elected legislatures to form new government is unconstitutional and mala fide act by the president.
Delhi116 February 201414 February 2015363 daysArvind Kejriwal resigned as Chief Minister after failing to table the Jan Lokpal Bill in the Delhi Assembly.
Goa114 December 199025 January 199142 daysC.M. resigned consequent upon his disqualification by High Court – No other Government found viable.
210 February 19999 June 1999119 daysLoss of majority and no alternate claimant to form next government.
34 March 20057 June 200595 daysGovernment dismissed after controversial confidence vote secured in the Assembly by CM Pratap Sinh Rane.
Goa, Daman and Diu13 December 19665 April 1967123 daysThe Union Territory of Goa's Assembly was dissolved to conduct an opinion poll to determine whether Goa should be merged with Maharashtra.
227 April 197916 January 1980264 daysLoss of majority following split in the ruling MGP Party.
Gujarat113 May 197117 March 1972309 daysLoss of majority following vertical split in Congress during 1969 presidential election.
29 February 197418 June 19751 year, 129 daysChimanbhai Patel led Congress government resigned due to Navnirman Movement Anti-Corruption protests. The protesters forced MLA's resignations, forcing dissolution of assembly.
312 March 197624 December 1976287 days"Non-Passage" of budget leading to collapse of government.
417 February 19807 June 1980111 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of Babubhai J Patel enjoying majority support in the Assembly
519 September 199623 October 199634 daysGovernment dismissed following a controversial confidence vote. The Assembly was placed in suspended animation, which led to subsequent installation of Vaghela government, supported by Congress.
Haryana12 November 196721 May 1968182 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of having a tenuous majority.
230 April 197721 June 197752 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of B D Gupta enjoying majority support in Assembly.
36 April 199123 June 199178 daysRebellion in the ruling party.
Himachal Pradesh130 April 197722 June 197753 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of Thakur Ram Lal enjoying majority support in Assembly.
215 December 19923 December 1993353 daysGovernment dismissed in the aftermath of the destruction of Babri Masjid-Ram Janmasthan in Uttar Pradesh.
Jammu and Kashmir (State)127 March 19779 July 1977104 daysSheikh Abdullah led National Conference government bowed out after being reduced to a minority following withdrawal of support by the Congress Party.
27 March 19866 November 1986244 daysLoss of majority.
319 January 19909 October 19966 years, 264 daysIncreased Militancy, Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus & breakdown of law & order
510 July 20085 January 2009179 daysLoss of majority following collapse of coalition. CM Gulam Nabi Azad's decision to transfer land for Amarnath pilgrimage led to PDP pulling out of coalition Govt.
69 January 20151 March 201551 daysFailure of Government formation after fractured verdict in Assembly elections. BJP & PDP reached an understanding to form an alliance to form Government in J&K.
78 January 20164 April 201687 daysDeath of chief minister Mufti Mohammad Sayeed.
819 June 201830 October 20191 year, 133 daysResignation of the Chief Minister following loss of coalition partner. On 31 October 2019, Jammu and Kashmir state was split into two union territories, UT of Jammu and Kashmir and UT of Ladakh.
Jammu and Kashmir (Union Territory)131 October 201913 October 20244 years, 348 daysImposed under section 73 of Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 (Article 356 does not apply to Union Territories)
Jharkhand119 January 200930 December 2009345 daysPolitical instability due to CM Shibu Soren's resignation following defeat in Tamar bypolls.
21 June 201011 September 2010102 daysLoss of majority.
318 January 201313 July 2013176 daysLoss of majority BJP's ruling coalition partner JMM withdrew its support to the government pushing it into a minority. Chief Minister Arjun Munda resigned and sought dissolution of the state Assembly.
Karnataka127 March 197120 March 1972359 daysLoss of majority.
231 December 197727 February 197858 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of Congress CM Devraj Urs enjoying majority support in Assembly.
321 April 198930 November 1989223 daysLoss of majority of CM S. R. Bommai, followed by dissolution of Assembly. On an appeal by S. R. Bommai, in a landmark judgement delivered in 1994, the Indian Supreme Court laid out the procedure to be followed before dissolving an elected assembly. The historic ruling in this case reduced the scope for misuse of Article 356 by future central governments and governors.
410 October 199017 October 19907 daysGovernment of Veerendra Patil dismissed by Prime Minister V. P. Singh and state was placed under president's rule with the assembly placed in suspended animation until next chief Minister was elected.
59 October 200712 November 200734 daysLoss of majority.
620 November 200730 May 2008192 daysLoss of majority.
Kerala131 July 195922 February 1960206 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of Communist CM EMS Namboodiripad enjoying majority support in Assembly.
210 September 19646 March 19672 years, 177 daysLoss of majority followed by indecisive outcome of elections.
34 August 19703 October 197060 daysLoss of majority.
45 December 197925 January 198051 daysLoss of majority.
521 October 198128 December 198168 daysLoss of majority due to withdrawal of support by Congress(S) and Kerala Congress(M).
617 March 198224 May 198268 daysLoss of majority following defection of Lonappan Nambadan.
Madhya Pradesh130 April 197723 June 197754 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of Shyama Charan Shukla enjoying majority support in Assembly.
217 February 19809 June 1980113 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of Sundar Lal Patwa enjoying majority support in Assembly.
315 December 19927 December 1993357 daysGovt. dismissed in the aftermath of Babri Masjid-Ram Janmasthan destruction in Uttar Pradesh.
Maharashtra117 February 19809 June 1980113 daysGovt. dismissed in spite of Sharad Pawar enjoying majority support in the Assembly.
228 September 201431 October 201433 daysGovt. dismissed since Congress Separated from its allies NCP and Others.
312 November 201923 November 201911 daysNo party could form a government after a fractured election verdict and Shiv Sena broke the pre-poll alliance it had with the BJP. See also: 2019 Maharashtra political crisis.
Manipur125 October 196719 February 1968117 daysShort lived ministry collapsed following resignation of speaker, resulting in neither ruling nor opposition congress having a clear majority in the assembly. Assembly kept in suspended animation.
216 October 196920 March 19722 years, 156 daysViolent secessionist insurgency and statehood demands resulted in breakdown of law and order.
328 March 19734 March 1974341 daysPresident's rule was imposed even though the opposition had a "tenuous" majority and could have formed a government.
416 May 197726 June 197741 daysCollapse of Government following defections.
514 November 197913 January 198060 daysDiscontent within Janata Party Government and corruption charges led to dismissal of government and dissolution of Assembly.
628 February 198119 June 1981111 daysIncumbent Government fell following defections. Governor did not permit an alternate government to be formed by People's Democratic Front on the basis of his assessment regarding stability of the proposed ministry.
77 January 19928 April 199292 daysIncumbent coalition Government fell following defections. president's rule imposed keeping assembly in suspension.
831 December 199313 December 1994347 days1000 persons died in Naga-Kuki clashes and continued violence.
92 June 20015 March 2002276 daysLoss of majority.
1013 February 20253 February 2026355 daysChief Minister N. Biren Singh resigned following the 2023–2025 Manipur violence amidst a crisis of possible no-confidence motion. Assembly put under suspended animation. Chief Minister Yumnam Khemchand Singh appointed new CM & President’s rule finally lifted after nearly 1 year.
Meghalaya111 October 19915 February 1992117 daysThe Centre imposed president's rule in Meghalaya in the wake of a political crisis after the then Speaker PR Kyndiah suspended five MLAs, mostly independents, on grounds of defection.
219 March 200913 May 200956 daysGovernment dismissed after controversial confidence vote secured in the Assembly by CM Donkupar Roy.
Mizoram111 May 19772 June 19781 year, 22 daysMizo Union Ministry led by Chief Minister Chhunga resigned in May 1977, ostensibly to facilitate the progress of peace talks.
211 November 19788 May 1979178 daysChief Minister Sailo's refusal to grant undue favours caused dissension in his party which led to the fall of his government and imposition of president's rule.
37 September 198824 January 1989139 daysDefections reduced the Government to minority.
Nagaland122 March 197525 November 19772 years, 248 daysDefections and counter defections led to imposition of president's rule.
27 August 198825 January 1989171 daysThe state was under a brief spell of central rule again after the Hokishe Sema-led Congress government was reduced to a minority. The decision was challenged in the Supreme Court in held to be invalid in 1994.
32 April 199222 February 1993326 daysFluid party position and deteriorating law and order situation.
43 January 200812 March 200869 daysGovernment dismissed after controversial confidence vote secured in the Assembly by CM Neiphiu Rio.
Odisha125 February 196123 June 1961118 daysHarekrishna Mahtab led Congress-Gantantra Parishad Minority Government resigned on 21 February 1961 due to differences in the Congress Party. President's rule was imposed on 25 February 1961.
211 January 19713 April 197182 daysBreak-up of coalition.
33 March 19736 March 19741 year, 3 daysFacing imminent collapse of government, incumbent chief minister recommended dissolution of assembly and fresh elections.
416 December 197629 December 197613 daysChief Minister Nandini Satpathy was forced out and assembly placed under suspended animation. A new Congress government was sworn in after revocation of president's rule.
530 April 197726 June 197757 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of Binayak Acharya enjoying majority support in Assembly.
617 February 19809 June 1980113 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of Nilamani Routray enjoying majority support in Assembly.
Patiala and East Punjab States Union14 March 19537 March 19541 year, 3 daysPresident's rule was invoked in the erstwhile PEPSU (Patiala and East Punjab States Union ) State when the Akali Dal government, led by Gian Singh Rarewala, was dismissed.
Puducherry118 September 196817 March 1969180 daysAssembly was dissolved and president's rule imposed as opposition parties had a chance to form a government after the fall of the Congress government.
23 January 19746 March 197462 daysAssembly dissolved after fall of DMK government following decision of two ministers to join newly formed AIADMK.
328 March 19742 July 19773 years, 96 daysFall of coalition government of AIADMK, Congress(O) following division of votes by Congress(R) and DMK. The Assembly was dissolved.
412 November 197816 January 19801 year, 65 daysFall of government due to political instability.
524 June 198316 March 19851 year, 265 daysGovernment dismissed following withdrawal of Congress(I) from coalition government. In spite of incumbent chief minister asking for an opportunity to prove his majority on the floor of the house, the assembly was dissolved.
612 January 19914 July 1991173 daysDMK Government dismissed in spite of having a majority in the Assembly.
725 February 20217 May 202171 daysCongress Government resigned due to loss of majority and no alternate claimant to form next government.
Punjab120 June 195117 April 1952302 daysPrime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru kept the Punjab Assembly in suspension for nine months and 28 days to help the state Congress government get its act together.
25 July 19661 November 1966119 daysState administration was taken over, ostensibly to facilitate bifurcation of Punjab state into two, Punjab and Haryana.
323 August 196817 February 1969178 daysBreak-up of coalition.
415 June 197117 March 1972276 daysFollowing poor performance in March, 1971 Lok Sabha Elections, incumbent Chief Minister advised dissolving state assembly and holding fresh elections to state legislature.
530 April 197720 June 197751 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of Giani Zail Singh enjoying majority support in Assembly.
617 February 19807 June 1980111 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of Parkash Singh Badal enjoying majority support in Assembly.
76 October 198329 September 19851 year, 358 daysMany Khalistani separatist groups announced the creation of Khalistan.
811 May 198723 February 19924 years, 288 daysBreakdown of law and order by several militant groups.
Rajasthan113 March 196726 April 196744 daysIndecisive outcome of elections.
230 April 197722 June 197753 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of Hari Dev Joshi enjoying majority support in Assembly.
317 February 19805 June 1980109 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of Bhairon Singh Shekhawat enjoying majority support in Assembly.
415 December 19924 December 1993354 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of Bhairon Singh Shekhawat enjoying majority support in Assembly.
Sikkim118 August 197817 October 19791 year, 60 daysLoss of majority following split in Kazi Lhendup Dorji led Janata Party government. The central government imposed president's rule and followed up with electoral reforms before ordering fresh elections.
225 May 19848 March 1985287 daysCongress Government formed following induced collapse of Nar Bahadur Bhandari Sikkim Janata Parishad Government was dismissed as it did not enjoy a majority in the Assembly.
Tamil Nadu131 January 197630 June 19771 year, 150 daysThe government headed by former chief minister M. Karunanidhi was dismissed by former prime minister Indira Gandhi in spite enjoying majority in the legislative assembly, due to charges of corruption while the Sarkaria Commission was set up to probe the allegations.
217 February 19809 June 1980113 daysThe government headed by former chief minister M. G. Ramachandran was dismissed by former prime minister Indira Gandhi in spite enjoying majority in the legislative assembly.
330 January 198827 January 1989363 daysThe government headed by former chief minister V. N. Janaki Ramachandran was dismissed by former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi after controversial confidence vote secured by her in the legislative assembly.
430 January 199124 June 1991145 daysThe government headed by former chief minister M. Karunanidhi was dismissed by former prime minister Chandra Shekhar on charges of supporting anti-national activities, in spite of the governor Surjit Singh Barnala's report and enjoying majority in the legislative assembly.
Travancore-Cochin123 March 19565 April 19571 year, 13 daysLoss of majority following split in Congress Party.
Tripura11 November 197120 March 1972140 daysIn the backdrop of refugee influx due to Bangladesh Liberation War, split in the Congress and Communist agitation for Tripura to become a full-fledged state, president's rule was imposed. On 1 January 1972 Tripura became a State and assembly elections held subsequently.
25 November 19774 January 197860 daysCollapse of short lived government in a fluid political environment.
311 March 199310 April 199330 daysElections postponed from 15 February 1993 to 3 April 1993 on account of deteriorating law and order situation. Caretaker CM resigns.
Uttar Pradesh125 February 196826 February 19691 year, 1 dayLoss of majority following withdrawal of support by Congress (R) led by Indira Gandhi.
21 October 197018 October 197017 daysCharan Singh Ministry supported by Congress collapsed following split in Congress party.
313 June 19738 November 1973148 daysChief Minister resigned as a result of the 1973 Provincial Armed Constabulary revolt.
430 November 197521 January 197652 daysCongress Government of H N Bahuguna tendered resignation due to infighting within the party.
530 April 197723 June 197754 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of N D Tiwari enjoying majority support in Assembly.
617 February 19809 June 1980113 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of Banarasi Das enjoying majority support in Assembly.
76 December 19924 December 1993363 daysGovernment dismissed in the aftermath of the destruction of Babri Masjid-Ram Janmasthan.
818 October 199521 March 19971 year, 154 daysLoss of majority following collapse of coalition followed by indecisive outcome of fresh elections.
98 March 20023 May 200256 daysIndecisive outcome of elections.
Uttarakhand127 March 201621 April 201625 daysCollapse of CM Harish Rawat's ministry following a split in the state unit of Congress party. In the hearing of related case, Uttarakhand High Court declared the president's rule imposition by the President unconstitutional and restored the Harish Rawat's led government in the state.
222 April 201611 May 201619 daysSupreme Court of India held the stay on Uttarakhand High Court's verdict thus reinstating the president's rule in the state.
West Bengal120 February 196825 February 19691 year, 5 daysState placed under president's rule following collapse of two successive short lived coalition governments.
219 March 19702 April 19711 year, 14 daysCollapse of United Front Coalition between Bangla Congress and CPI(M).
329 June 197120 March 1972265 daysCollapse of Democratic Coalition following split in Bangla Congress.
430 April 197721 June 197752 daysGovernment dismissed in spite of Siddhartha Shankar Ray enjoying majority support in Assembly.

See also

External links

  • Article 355 and 356 text from wikisource