The World Chess Championship 2016 was a chess match between the reigning world champion Magnus Carlsen and the challenger Sergey Karjakin to determine the World Chess Champion. Carlsen had been world champion since 2013, while Karjakin qualified as challenger by winning the 2016 Candidates Tournament. The best-of-12 match, organized by FIDE and its commercial partner World Chess (former Agon), was played in New York City between 10 and 30 November 2016.

The match opened with seven consecutive draws before Karjakin won the eighth game. Carlsen evened the score by winning the tenth game. All other games were drawn, leaving the match at a 6–6 tie, so tie breaks decided the match. After two draws to begin the rapid chess tie break, Carlsen won the remaining two games to win the match and retain his title.

Final position after 50.Qh6+!! in the final tie-break game. Carlsen's sham queen sacrifice forces mate next move: 50...Kxh6 51.Rh8# or 50...gxh6 51.Rxf7#.

Planning timeline

  • 27 November, 2014: At the closing ceremony for the 2014 championship, FIDE president Ilyumzhinov announces the 2016 match will take place in the United States.
  • 4 October, 2015: At the 2015 Chess World Cup, Ilyumzhinov reiterates the location as the United States, saying that the date and place were already final.
  • 15 December, 2015: FIDE and Agon sign media rights deal with Norwegian broadcaster NRK, listing 7-figures (in unknown currency) until 2020.
  • 8 January, 2016: FIDE announces that Agon has made operational an official broadcasting platform (worldchess.com) for the World Chess Championship cycle events (already present in October 2015).
  • 1 March, 2016: Agon announce that the city will be New York City, with approval from its mayor.
  • 4 March, 2016: Agon announce that only approved broadcasters will be allowed to retransmit moves from the Candidates and ensuing World Championship.
  • 28 March, 2016: Sergey Karjakin wins the Candidates Tournament 2016 to qualify to play Magnus Carlsen.
  • 26 May, 2016: Agon head Ilya Merenzon says that "The contract between FIDE and Agon is finalized and is being signed. The contract between the players and FIDE will be finalized in the next 2–3 weeks."
  • 7 June, 2016: Agon announces that a venue has been found in New York City, with only sponsor details and paperwork left to be finalized in the next 2 weeks.
  • 8 August, 2016: Agon announce the venue as the Fulton Market building in the South Street Seaport in lower Manhattan.
  • 30 August, 2016: Agon publish on their website that PhosAgro has signed a strategic partnership contract as a sponsor of the 2016 FIDE World Chess Championship.
  • 12 September, 2016: Agon announce EG Capital Advisors as a sponsor, and give pricing packages for virtual reality viewing options.
  • 30 September, 2016: Tickets go on sale. The lowest price listed is $75 per game.
  • 17 October, 2016: Agon announce their new broadcast model for the World Championship.

Candidates Tournament

The Candidates Tournament to determine the challenger was held on 11–30 March 2016 in Moscow, Russia, with FIDE's commercial partner Agon as the official organizer, with support from the Russian Chess Federation. The tournament was an 8-player double round-robin, with five different qualification paths possible: the loser of the World Chess Championship 2014 match, the top two finishers in the Chess World Cup 2015, the top two finishers in the FIDE Grand Prix 2014–15, next two highest rated players (average FIDE rating on the 12 monthly lists from January to December 2015, with at least 30 games played) who played in Chess World Cup 2015 or FIDE Grand Prix 2014–15, and one player nominated by Agon (the organizers).

Qualified players

Qualification pathPlayerAgeRatingRank
runners up of the World Chess Championship 2014 matchIndia Viswanathan Anand46276212
Winner of the Chess World Cup 2015Russia Sergey Karjakin26276013
Runner-up of the Chess World Cup 2015Russia Peter Svidler39275716
The top two finishers in the FIDE Grand Prix 2014–15United States Italy Fabiano Caruana2327943
United States Hikaru Nakamura2827906
The top two players with highest average 2015 rating who played in World Cup or Grand PrixBulgaria Veselin Topalov4127808
Netherlands Anish Giri2127934
Wild card nomination of the organizers (Agon), with FIDE rating in July 2015 at least 2725Armenia Levon Aronian3327867

Standings

PosPlayervtePldWDLPtsQualificationKARCARANASVIAROGIRNAKTOP
1Sergey Karjakin (RUS) (Q)144918.5Advance to title match10½½½½½½
2Fabiano Caruana (USA)1421117.5½0½½½½½½½½
3Viswanathan Anand (IND)144737.510½0½½½0
4Peter Svidler (RUS)1411217½½½½½0½1½½½½½½
5Levon Aronian (ARM)1421027½½½½½0½½½1
6Anish Giri (NED)1401407½½½½½½½½½½½½½½
7Hikaru Nakamura (USA)143837½0½0½½½0½½11
8Veselin Topalov (BUL)140954.5½0½½½0½½½½00

Results by round

Pairings and results

Numbers in parentheses indicate players' scores prior to the round.

Round 1 – 11 March 2016 Viswanathan Anand Veselin Topalov 1–0 C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defence Anish Giri Levon Aronian ½–½ D37 Queen's Gambit Declined Sergey Karjakin Peter Svidler ½–½ D16 Slav Defence, Soultanbéieff Variation Hikaru Nakamura Fabiano Caruana ½–½ A30 English Opening, Symmetrical Variation Round 2 – 12 March 2016 Levon Aronian (½) Viswanathan Anand (1) ½–½ D37 Queen's Gambit Declined Fabiano Caruana (½) Anish Giri (½) ½–½ B32 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defence Sergey Karjakin (½) Hikaru Nakamura (½) 1–0 E15 Queen's Indian Defence, Fianchetto Variation, Check Variation, Intermezzo Line Peter Svidler (½) Veselin Topalov (0) ½–½ C67 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defence Round 3 – 13 March 2016 Viswanathan Anand (1½) Fabiano Caruana (1) ½–½ C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defence Anish Giri (1) Sergey Karjakin (1½) ½–½ E15 Queen's Indian Defence, Fianchetto Variation, Check Variation, Intermezzo Line Hikaru Nakamura (½) Peter Svidler (1) ½–½ D16 Slav Defence, Soultanbéieff Variation Veselin Topalov (½) Levon Aronian (1) 0–1 A29 English, Four Knights, Kingside Fianchetto Round 4 – 15 March 2016 Fabiano Caruana (1½) Veselin Topalov (½) ½–½ C50 Giuoco Piano Sergey Karjakin (2) Viswanathan Anand (2) 1–0 A06 Réti Opening Hikaru Nakamura (1) Anish Giri (1½) ½–½ D45 Semi-Slav, Stoltz Variation Peter Svidler (1½) Levon Aronian (2) ½–½ A22 English, Four Knights, Smyslov System Round 5 – 16 March 2016 Viswanathan Anand (2) Hikaru Nakamura (1½) ½–½ C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defence Levon Aronian (2½) Fabiano Caruana (2) ½–½ A77 Benoni Defence, Classical, Czerniak Defence, Tal Line Anish Giri (2) Peter Svidler (2) ½–½ D73 Neo-Grünfeld Defence Veselin Topalov (1) Sergey Karjakin (3) ½–½ E15 Queen's Indian Defence, Fianchetto Variation, Check Variation, Intermezzo Line Round 6 – 17 March 2016 Viswanathan Anand (2½) Peter Svidler (2½) 1–0 C88 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Anti-Marshall 8.a4 Veselin Topalov (1½) Anish Giri (2½) ½–½ E61 Indian Game, West Indian Defence Levon Aronian (3) Hikaru Nakamura (2) 1–0 E15 Queen's Indian Defence, Fianchetto Variation, Nimzowistch Variation Fabiano Caruana (2½) Sergey Karjakin (3½) ½–½ E15 Queen's Indian Defence, Fianchetto Variation, Check Variation, Intermezzo Line Round 7 – 19 March 2016 Peter Svidler (2½) Fabiano Caruana (3) ½–½ A35 English, Symmetrical, Four Knights Sergey Karjakin (4) Levon Aronian (4) ½–½ A08 King's Indian Attack Hikaru Nakamura (2) Veselin Topalov (2) 1–0 D12 Slav Defence, Quiet Variation, Schallop Defence Anish Giri (3) Viswanathan Anand (3½) ½–½ D37 Queen's Gambit Declined, Barmen VariationRound 8 – 20 March 2016 Peter Svidler (3) Sergey Karjakin (4½) ½–½ A29 English, Four Knights, Fianchetto Line Fabiano Caruana (3½) Hikaru Nakamura (3) 1–0 C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defence Levon Aronian (4½) Anish Giri (3½) ½–½ D43 Semi-Slav Defense Veselin Topalov (2) Viswanathan Anand (4) ½–½ A11 Queen's Gambit Declined, Barmen Variation Round 9 – 21 March 2016 Veselin Topalov (2½) Peter Svidler (3½) ½–½ C88 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Anti-Marshall 8.a4 Viswanathan Anand (4½) Levon Aronian (5) 1–0 C50 Giuoco Piano Anish Giri (4) Fabiano Caruana (4½) ½–½ D70 Neo-Grünfeld Defence, Goglidze Attack Hikaru Nakamura (3) Sergey Karjakin (5) ½–½ E15 Queen's Indian Defence, Fianchetto Variation, Check Variation, Intermezzo Line Round 10 – 23 March 2016 Peter Svidler (4) Hikaru Nakamura (3½) ½–½ A29 English, Four Knights, Fianchetto Line Sergey Karjakin (5½) Anish Giri (4½) ½–½ D45f Semi-Slav, Stoltz Variation Fabiano Caruana (5) Viswanathan Anand (5½) 1–0 A29 English, Four Knights, Fianchetto Line Levon Aronian (5) Veselin Topalov (3) ½–½ A29 English, Four Knights, Fianchetto Line Round 11 – 24 March 2016 Levon Aronian (5½) Peter Svidler (4½) 0–1 D16 Slav Defence, Soultanbéieff Variation Veselin Topalov (3½) Fabiano Caruana (6) ½–½ A33 English, Symmetrical, Anti-Benoni Viswanathan Anand (5½) Sergey Karjakin (6) 1–0 A07 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defence Anish Giri (5) Hikaru Nakamura (4) ½–½ C50 Giuoco Piano Round 12 – 25 March 2016 Peter Svidler (5½) Anish Giri (5½) ½–½ A29 English, Four Knights, Fianchetto Line Hikaru Nakamura (4½) Viswanathan Anand (6½) 1–0 A29 English, Four Knights, Fianchetto Line Sergey Karjakin (6) Veselin Topalov (4) 1–0 B90 Sicilian Defence, Najdorf Variation, Adams Attack Fabiano Caruana (6½) Levon Aronian (5½) ½–½ C78 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Martinez Variation Round 13 – 27 March 2016 Fabiano Caruana (7) Peter Svidler (6) ½–½ C78 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Martinez Variation Levon Aronian (6) Sergey Karjakin (7) ½–½ A29 English, Four Knights, Fianchetto Line Veselin Topalov (4) Hikaru Nakamura (5½) 0–1 D37 Queen's Gambit Declined Viswanathan Anand (6½) Anish Giri (6) ½–½ C50 Giuoco Piano Round 14 – 28 March 2016 Peter Svidler (6½) Viswanathan Anand (7) ½–½ A29 English, Four Knights, Fianchetto Line Anish Giri (6½) Veselin Topalov (4) ½–½ E06 Catalan Opening, Closed Variation Hikaru Nakamura (6½) Levon Aronian (6½) ½–½ D38 Queen's Gambit Declined, Razogin Variation, Alekhine Variation Sergey Karjakin (7½) Fabiano Caruana (7½) 1–0 B67 Sicilian Defence, Richter-Rauzer Attack, Neo-Modern Variation
Round 1 – 11 March 2016
Viswanathan AnandVeselin Topalov1–0C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defence
Anish GiriLevon Aronian½–½D37 Queen's Gambit Declined
Sergey KarjakinPeter Svidler½–½D16 Slav Defence, Soultanbéieff Variation
Hikaru NakamuraFabiano Caruana½–½A30 English Opening, Symmetrical Variation
Round 2 – 12 March 2016
Levon Aronian (½)Viswanathan Anand (1)½–½D37 Queen's Gambit Declined
Fabiano Caruana (½)Anish Giri (½)½–½B32 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defence
Sergey Karjakin (½)Hikaru Nakamura (½)1–0E15 Queen's Indian Defence, Fianchetto Variation, Check Variation, Intermezzo Line
Peter Svidler (½)Veselin Topalov (0)½–½C67 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defence
Round 3 – 13 March 2016
Viswanathan Anand (1½)Fabiano Caruana (1)½–½C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defence
Anish Giri (1)Sergey Karjakin (1½)½–½E15 Queen's Indian Defence, Fianchetto Variation, Check Variation, Intermezzo Line
Hikaru Nakamura (½)Peter Svidler (1)½–½D16 Slav Defence, Soultanbéieff Variation
Veselin Topalov (½)Levon Aronian (1)0–1A29 English, Four Knights, Kingside Fianchetto
Round 4 – 15 March 2016
Fabiano Caruana (1½)Veselin Topalov (½)½–½C50 Giuoco Piano
Sergey Karjakin (2)Viswanathan Anand (2)1–0A06 Réti Opening
Hikaru Nakamura (1)Anish Giri (1½)½–½D45 Semi-Slav, Stoltz Variation
Peter Svidler (1½)Levon Aronian (2)½–½A22 English, Four Knights, Smyslov System
Round 5 – 16 March 2016
Viswanathan Anand (2)Hikaru Nakamura (1½)½–½C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defence
Levon Aronian (2½)Fabiano Caruana (2)½–½A77 Benoni Defence, Classical, Czerniak Defence, Tal Line
Anish Giri (2)Peter Svidler (2)½–½D73 Neo-Grünfeld Defence
Veselin Topalov (1)Sergey Karjakin (3)½–½E15 Queen's Indian Defence, Fianchetto Variation, Check Variation, Intermezzo Line
Round 6 – 17 March 2016
Viswanathan Anand (2½)Peter Svidler (2½)1–0C88 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Anti-Marshall 8.a4
Veselin Topalov (1½)Anish Giri (2½)½–½E61 Indian Game, West Indian Defence
Levon Aronian (3)Hikaru Nakamura (2)1–0E15 Queen's Indian Defence, Fianchetto Variation, Nimzowistch Variation
Fabiano Caruana (2½)Sergey Karjakin (3½)½–½E15 Queen's Indian Defence, Fianchetto Variation, Check Variation, Intermezzo Line
Round 7 – 19 March 2016
Peter Svidler (2½)Fabiano Caruana (3)½–½A35 English, Symmetrical, Four Knights
Sergey Karjakin (4)Levon Aronian (4)½–½A08 King's Indian Attack
Hikaru Nakamura (2)Veselin Topalov (2)1–0D12 Slav Defence, Quiet Variation, Schallop Defence
Anish Giri (3)Viswanathan Anand (3½)½–½D37 Queen's Gambit Declined, Barmen Variation
Round 8 – 20 March 2016
Peter Svidler (3)Sergey Karjakin (4½)½–½A29 English, Four Knights, Fianchetto Line
Fabiano Caruana (3½)Hikaru Nakamura (3)1–0C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defence
Levon Aronian (4½)Anish Giri (3½)½–½D43 Semi-Slav Defense
Veselin Topalov (2)Viswanathan Anand (4)½–½A11 Queen's Gambit Declined, Barmen Variation
Round 9 – 21 March 2016
Veselin Topalov (2½)Peter Svidler (3½)½–½C88 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Anti-Marshall 8.a4
Viswanathan Anand (4½)Levon Aronian (5)1–0C50 Giuoco Piano
Anish Giri (4)Fabiano Caruana (4½)½–½D70 Neo-Grünfeld Defence, Goglidze Attack
Hikaru Nakamura (3)Sergey Karjakin (5)½–½E15 Queen's Indian Defence, Fianchetto Variation, Check Variation, Intermezzo Line
Round 10 – 23 March 2016
Peter Svidler (4)Hikaru Nakamura (3½)½–½A29 English, Four Knights, Fianchetto Line
Sergey Karjakin (5½)Anish Giri (4½)½–½D45f Semi-Slav, Stoltz Variation
Fabiano Caruana (5)Viswanathan Anand (5½)1–0A29 English, Four Knights, Fianchetto Line
Levon Aronian (5)Veselin Topalov (3)½–½A29 English, Four Knights, Fianchetto Line
Round 11 – 24 March 2016
Levon Aronian (5½)Peter Svidler (4½)0–1D16 Slav Defence, Soultanbéieff Variation
Veselin Topalov (3½)Fabiano Caruana (6)½–½A33 English, Symmetrical, Anti-Benoni
Viswanathan Anand (5½)Sergey Karjakin (6)1–0A07 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defence
Anish Giri (5)Hikaru Nakamura (4)½–½C50 Giuoco Piano
Round 12 – 25 March 2016
Peter Svidler (5½)Anish Giri (5½)½–½A29 English, Four Knights, Fianchetto Line
Hikaru Nakamura (4½)Viswanathan Anand (6½)1–0A29 English, Four Knights, Fianchetto Line
Sergey Karjakin (6)Veselin Topalov (4)1–0B90 Sicilian Defence, Najdorf Variation, Adams Attack
Fabiano Caruana (6½)Levon Aronian (5½)½–½C78 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Martinez Variation
Round 13 – 27 March 2016
Fabiano Caruana (7)Peter Svidler (6)½–½C78 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Martinez Variation
Levon Aronian (6)Sergey Karjakin (7)½–½A29 English, Four Knights, Fianchetto Line
Veselin Topalov (4)Hikaru Nakamura (5½)0–1D37 Queen's Gambit Declined
Viswanathan Anand (6½)Anish Giri (6)½–½C50 Giuoco Piano
Round 14 – 28 March 2016
Peter Svidler (6½)Viswanathan Anand (7)½–½A29 English, Four Knights, Fianchetto Line
Anish Giri (6½)Veselin Topalov (4)½–½E06 Catalan Opening, Closed Variation
Hikaru Nakamura (6½)Levon Aronian (6½)½–½D38 Queen's Gambit Declined, Razogin Variation, Alekhine Variation
Sergey Karjakin (7½)Fabiano Caruana (7½)1–0B67 Sicilian Defence, Richter-Rauzer Attack, Neo-Modern Variation

Summary

Going into the final round, Caruana and Karjakin were tied for the lead, half a point ahead of Anand, and played each other in the final round. Due to the tie breaks situation, the only possible tournament winners were Caruana and Karjakin, with the winner of their final game also the winner of the tournament. A draw would cause the tournament result to depend on Anand's game against Svidler; if Anand won then Caruana would win, but otherwise Karjakin would win. Karjakin had the further advantage of white in the final game. Caruana played for a win in the final round, but overpressed, and at the critical moment, Karjakin calculated correctly and won the game and tournament. In retrospect, Karjakin's draw with black in his other game against Caruana, which Chessbase called a "brilliant defensive effort", was critical. Karjakin's victory qualified him as the official challenger.

Championship match

The Championship match between Magnus Carlsen and Sergey Karjakin was held from 10 to 30 November 2016 in New York City, United States, under the auspices of FIDE.

Previous head-to-head record

Prior to the match, as of 10 November 2016, Carlsen and Karjakin had played each other 21 times (at long time controls) with Carlsen leading 4 wins to 1 with 16 draws. Their most recent encounter was at the July 2016 Bilbao Chess Masters double round-robin tournament, where Carlsen won one game while the other was drawn.

Head-to-head record
Carlsen winsDrawKarjakin winsTotal
ClassicalCarlsen (white) – Karjakin (black)2619
Karjakin (white) – Carlsen (black)210012
Total416121
Blitz / rapid / exhibition145726
Total1821847

Lead up to match

After his victory in the Candidates Tournament 2016, Karjakin was scheduled to play in the Norway Chess event in April with a head-to-head game against Carlsen on tap, but cancelled his appearance, citing fatigue from the Candidates victory. He then surprised Carlsen by agreeing to play in the double round-robin Bilbao tournament in July. The games at the Bilbao tournament were played at a slightly faster initial rate (40 moves in 90 minutes) than that used in the World Chess Championship (40 moves in 100 minutes). Carlsen defeated Karjakin in their first game in the Bilbao tournament, while the second was drawn. He credited the faster time control in making it difficult for Karjakin to deal with pressure.

Organization and location

View of the South Street Seaport, the location of the 2016 World Championship
View of the South Street Seaport, the location of the 2016 World Championship

The match was held under the auspices of FIDE, the world chess federation, with the organisation rights belonging to Agon, its commercial partner. It took place between 11 and 30 November in the renovated Fulton Market Building (formerly Fulton Fish Market) in the South Street Seaport in New York City, with the two contestants competing for a prize fund of at least 1 million euros (US$1.1m). The chief arbiter was Takis Nikolopoulos from Greece.

Match regulations

According to the match regulations put forward by FIDE, the players could not draw a game by agreement before Black's 30th move, but they could claim a draw by threefold repetition. The time control was set at:

  • for full-time control games, 100 minutes for the first 40 moves, 50 minutes for the next 20 moves and then 15 minutes for the rest of the game plus an additional 30 seconds per move starting from move 1.
  • for rapid games, 25 minutes with 10 seconds increment per move (3.7.1a). The player with the best score after four games is world champion; if tied, players will play up to five two-game blitz matches.
  • for blitz games (except the final sudden death game), 5 minutes with 3 seconds increment per move (3.7.2). The player with the best score after any two-game blitz match is world champion; if tied, players will play one sudden death game.
  • for the final sudden death game, 5 minutes for white pieces, 4 minutes for black pieces, no increment for the first 60 moves, 3 seconds increment per move starting at the move 61 (3.7.3). The winner of this game is world champion; if drawn, black is the winner and world champion.

Seconds

Magnus Carlsen's team for the match consisted of Peter Heine Nielsen (main coach), Jon Ludvig Hammer (regular sparring-partner), Espen Agdestein (manager). Additional support was from the analytic team which included Laurent Fressinet, Nils Grandelius, Jan Gustafsson, and Maxime Vachier-Lagrave. Samuel Shankland took part in some training camps, and Magnus also played training games against Richárd Rapport.

Sergey Karjakin's team for the match included Vladimir Potkin, Alexander Motylev, Yury Dokhoian, Shakhriyar Mamedyarov, and some undisclosed Russian grandmasters.

Opening press conference

The opening press conference was held on 10 November. FIDE President Kirsan Ilyumzhinov was unable to attend following sanctions from the US Government over his ties with the Syrian regime, but communicated by Skype instead with vice president Gelfer the official FIDE representative (rather than deputy president Makropoulos). Agon's CEO Ilya Merenzon attended, and the two major sponsors (EG Capital Advisors and PhosAgro) had representatives, with both players and the chief arbiter rounding out the principals.

Broadcast

The video feed on the official website was only available after paying a fee. Live commentary was provided by Agon and Chess24. Prior to the match AGON tried to deny other websites to show moves of the match. AGON went to court over this but lost their case.

Schedule and results

DateDayEvent
Date Day Event 10 November 2016 Thursday Opening ceremony 11 November 2016 Friday Game 1 12 November 2016 Saturday Game 2 13 November 2016 Sunday Rest day 14 November 2016 Monday Game 3 15 November 2016 Tuesday Game 4 16 November 2016 Wednesday Rest day 17 November 2016 Thursday Game 5 18 November 2016 Friday Game 6 19 November 2016 Saturday Rest day 20 November 2016 Sunday Game 7Date Day Event 21 November 2016 Monday Game 8 22 November 2016 Tuesday Rest day 23 November 2016 Wednesday Game 9 24 November 2016 Thursday Game 10 25 November 2016 Friday Rest day 26 November 2016 Saturday Game 11 27 November 2016 Sunday Rest day 28 November 2016 Monday Game 12 29 November 2016 Tuesday Rest day 30 November 2016 Wednesday Tie-break games 30 November 2016 Wednesday Awards and closing
10 November 2016ThursdayOpening ceremony
11 November 2016FridayGame 1
12 November 2016SaturdayGame 2
13 November 2016SundayRest day
14 November 2016MondayGame 3
15 November 2016TuesdayGame 4
16 November 2016WednesdayRest day
17 November 2016ThursdayGame 5
18 November 2016FridayGame 6
19 November 2016SaturdayRest day
20 November 2016SundayGame 7
DateDayEvent
21 November 2016MondayGame 8
22 November 2016TuesdayRest day
23 November 2016WednesdayGame 9
24 November 2016ThursdayGame 10
25 November 2016FridayRest day
26 November 2016SaturdayGame 11
27 November 2016SundayRest day
28 November 2016MondayGame 12
29 November 2016TuesdayRest day
30 November 2016WednesdayTie-break games
30 November 2016WednesdayAwards and closing

The games commenced each day at 14:00 local time in New York City.

World Chess Championship 2016
RatingClassical gamesPointsRapid gamesTotal
12345678910111213141516
Sergey Karjakin (RUS)2772½½½½½½½1½0½½6½½007
Magnus Carlsen (NOR)2853½½½½½½½0½1½½6½½119

Classical games

Game 1: Carlsen–Karjakin, ½–½

Position after 19.Rxc4

Carlsen opened with 1.d4, and then chose to play the Trompowsky Attack (1.d4 Nf6 2.Bg5), an uncommon opening at the elite level, though one which Carlsen has employed before. A temporary pawn sacrifice by White led to mass exchanges and an endgame in which White had the better pawn structure and so slightly better chances. However Black's position was solid and Karjakin defended robustly. After 42 moves the game was drawn.

Carlsen's opening choice was recalled multiple times in interviews and the post-game press conference, in part due to its uncommon reputation, but also because its name resonated with Donald Trump and the recent United States presidential election three days prior. Carlsen said that if he had known how many questions he would face over his opening choice, he would have played something else. Karjakin noted the media appeared more surprised about Carlsen's opening choice than he himself was, and indicated that perhaps move 27 was Carlsen's last chance to make something of the game.

Game 2: Karjakin–Carlsen, ½–½

Position before 18.dxe5

In game 2, Karjakin opened with 1.e4, which he had played in 9 of 12 prior encounters with Carlsen. Carlsen responded to Karjakin's Ruy Lopez with a classical line rather than the Berlin Defense. Karjakin then avoided the principal variation with 6.d3. Karjakin exchanged central pawns on move 18 (see diagram), and Carlsen said afterwards that Black was too solid in the center for White to regroup his Nc3 to g3.

After the game, Carlsen said that in a long match not every game is going to involve fireworks. The game had higher attendance than the opener, with one reason being that many schools used their free tickets on the weekend.

Game 3: Carlsen–Karjakin, ½–½

Position before 70.Nc6 (70.Re8 wins)

This game saw the Berlin Defense, which is quite often seen in the World Championship (4 times each in 2013 and 2014). Carlsen avoided the 'Berlin Endgame' by playing 5.Re1. A mainline was followed until Carlsen retreated his rook only to e2 on move 10, upon which Karjakin thought for nearly half an hour. Carlsen followed it up with 11.Re1, apparently losing a tempo but having provoked the move 10...b6. At the press conference afterwards he joked that 10.Re2 was a fingerfehler which he corrected on the next move. (In fact the idea had been tried the previous year by grandmaster Rustam Kasimdzhanov.) Karjakin accepted slightly weakened pawns, and in contrast to the previous games decided to aim for counterplay with 29...Ra8 then 30...Ra2 rather than sit passively. Carlsen soon won a pawn to emerge with the first real winning chances of the match. After many vicissitudes along the way, Carlsen missed the winning 70.Re8 (see diagram). After 70.Nc6, Black could reach a theoretical draw by 70...Rc3 (attacking the knight, which guards White's rook), though some difficult follow-up lines might be needed before a drawn pawnless endgame would definitively be reached. Karjakin instead immediately grabbed White's f-pawn (70...Kxf5), which would lose against perfect play, but Carlsen granted him another drawing chance two moves later with 72.Rb7. This time Karjakin found the necessary defense 72...Ra1. An ensuing liquidation saw Karjakin's passed h-pawn strong enough to compel Carlsen to acquiesce to a draw after almost seven hours of play.

The game was hailed as a miracle escape for Karjakin and a showcase of his defensive skills. At the postgame conference, Carlsen said that he never saw a clear win, that it was "a little bit disappointing" not to have converted, and responded "absolutely" when asked if he was afraid to find out from the computer how much he had missed.

Game 4: Karjakin–Carlsen, ½–½

Karjakin–Carlsen, game 4
abcdefgh8877665544332211abcdefghPosition after 17...Nc4. Karjakin's 18.Bxh6 was the start of sharp complications. abcdefgh8877665544332211abcdefghPosition after 45.Nd1. Carlsen played 45...f4?, allowing Karjakin to blockade the position and draw. 45...Be6 would have given a decisive advantage.
abcdefgh8877665544332211abcdefghPosition after 17...Nc4. Karjakin's 18.Bxh6 was the start of sharp complications.abcdefgh8877665544332211abcdefghPosition after 45.Nd1. Carlsen played 45...f4?, allowing Karjakin to blockade the position and draw. 45...Be6 would have given a decisive advantage.
abcdefgh
88
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
abcdefgh
88
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh

Both players repeated the classical Ruy Lopez opening from Game 2, but this time White went with the main line 6.Re1. After White avoided the Marshall Attack with 8.h3, the pace slowed at move 11, with Carlsen thinking for 4 minutes before Karjakin took 10 minutes on his 12th.

The game developed into a sharp middlegame when Karjakin played 18.Bxh6, but Carlsen navigated the complications better, gaining a small advantage. Karjakin eventually decided to trade queens and enter an inferior endgame. Carlsen was pressing along the way, but Karjakin defended stubbornly, and Carlsen's 45...f4? made the position easier to defend. The game was drawn after 94 moves.

Chessbase opined that, after four games, Karjakin still had to find a way to put Carlsen under pressure while Carlsen has to do the same to win his good positions.

Game 5: Carlsen–Karjakin, ½–½

Position after 41.Kg2

In this topsy-turvy game, Karjakin equalized easily out of the opening (a Giuoco Piano) and seized the initiative in a complicated middlegame. Carlsen managed to neutralize Karjakin's initiative to enter a major piece endgame with opposite-colored bishops which he can try endlessly to win without risking a loss – the exact kind of game which he is renowned for winning. However, he played aimlessly before the first time control. After the careless king move 41.Kg2? (blocking his major pieces from the soon-to-be-opened h-file) he suddenly came under pressure. Like Carlsen in games 3 and 4, Karjakin failed to make the most of these chances, and the game ended in a draw, albeit the first in the match in which Karjakin had serious winning chances.

Game 6: Karjakin–Carlsen, ½–½

Position after 16...f5. Carlsen's opening preparation went at least this far.

After three intense struggles, the sixth game was a quiet, relatively short draw. In a main line Ruy Lopez, Karjakin avoided the Marshall Attack (regarded as a drawish line at grandmaster level), playing instead 8.h3. Carlsen played the somewhat similar line 8...Bb7 9.d3 d5, sacrificing a pawn for positional compensation. Faced with Carlsen's opening preparation, Karjakin chose to return the pawn and after further simplifications the draw was agreed.

Game 7: Karjakin–Carlsen, ½–½

Position after 16...Rc8. Defending the b7-bishop (protecting it from potential discovered attacks by the f3-bishop) with 16...Rb8 17.Qe2 Qa5 18.Bb2 would have given Black a slight advantage.

After three unsuccessful attempts at gaining an advantage with 1.e4, Karjakin played 1.d4 for the first time in the match. Carlsen responded with the Slav Defense, which transposed into a tame variation of the Queen's Gambit Accepted. Karjakin made a slight inaccuracy with 11.Nd2, but Carlsen seemingly underestimated his position with 16...Rc8 and failed to capitalize. Several forced exchanges later, the game entered an opposite-color bishop endgame where White was a pawn up, but could make no progress.

Game 8: Carlsen–Karjakin, 0–1

Carlsen–Karjakin, game 8
abcdefgh8877665544332211abcdefghPosition after 19.Nb5. White invites Black to attack his king with 19...Qg5, but Karjakin declines. abcdefgh8877665544332211abcdefghPosition after 48...Nd3. According to Fabiano Caruana, Carlsen had a relatively easy draw by 49.e5, sacrificing a pawn to free his bishop. Instead after 49.Qa5? Qc5 50.Qa6 Ne5 Caruana assessed his position as "horribly difficult", and after 51.Qe6? h5! Karjakin was winning.
abcdefgh8877665544332211abcdefghPosition after 19.Nb5. White invites Black to attack his king with 19...Qg5, but Karjakin declines.abcdefgh8877665544332211abcdefghPosition after 48...Nd3. According to Fabiano Caruana, Carlsen had a relatively easy draw by 49.e5, sacrificing a pawn to free his bishop. Instead after 49.Qa5? Qc5 50.Qa6 Ne5 Caruana assessed his position as "horribly difficult", and after 51.Qe6? h5! Karjakin was winning.
abcdefgh
88
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
abcdefgh
88
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh

Carlsen played the Colle System, an innocuous opening rarely seen at grandmaster level. He then played recklessly for a win, openly inviting complications. Although analysis suggested that the complicated 19...Qg5 would have been good for Black, Karjakin refused to oblige, playing instead 19...Bc6. The position was equal, but Carlsen continued to play for a win. The move 24.bxc4 was criticized by commentators who said that if Carlsen wanted to make this recapture, it should have been done on move 22. Carlsen eventually overpressed with 35.c5?, going down two pawns for almost no compensation. In time trouble, Karjakin returned the blunder with 37...Qd3? (37...Qa4 was winning), allowing Carlsen to win back both pawns. The resulting position was objectively equal but double-edged in practice, with connected outside passed pawns but an exposed king for Karjakin. Once again Carlsen had forced drawing lines at his disposal, but chose to play for a win. Instead, he erred with 51.Qe6? and after 51...h5! 52.h4 a2! he resigned. (After 53.Qxa2 Ng4+ 54.Kh3 Qg1, White has to sacrifice the queen to avoid immediate mate.) International Master Sagar Shah attributed Carlsen's defeat to a loss of objectivity.

After the game Carlsen was visibly uncomfortable and left the press conference before it began, potentially incurring a fine of 5% of his prize money to the organizers Agon, and a further 5% to FIDE. FIDE released a statement the following day indicating that the penalty would be imposed. The fine was reduced on appeal to 5% of the prize money (2.5% to Agon and 2.5% to FIDE).

Game 9: Karjakin–Carlsen, ½–½

Position after 38...Ne7. Karjakin played 39.Bxf7+, but 39.Qb3 Nf5 40.Bxf7+ Kg7 41.Rh3 Qxf7 is a complicated variation which may have offered him more winning chances.

Carlsen opened with the Modern Archangelsk variation of the Spanish Game, a variation he had played only four times in his career. The game followed a line which Karjakin had used to beat Adams until move 18 at which point Carlsen deviated by playing 18...c5. Carlsen remained within his opening preparation until at least move 22, taking less than a minute to play the novelty 21...cxb3. The game developed into a pawn-up middlegame for White that offered White a long-term advantage, but Karjakin declined to sit on his 1-point lead and instead went for the win. The game became very tense with Carlsen consuming a lot of time. He played 38...Ne7 with less than two minutes on his clock, against Karjakin's 25 minutes. Karjakin invested most of the 25 minutes before making the bishop sacrifice 39.Bxf7+, when 39.Qb3 was also very strong and possibly even winning. In spite of his time situation, Carlsen defended accurately. In the resulting endgame White was still a pawn up, but the extra pawn was doubled. Karjakin kept playing, but could make no progress, and the game was drawn after 74 moves.

Game 10: Carlsen–Karjakin, 1–0

Carlsen–Karjakin, game 10
abcdefgh8877665544332211abcdefghPosition after 20.Nd2. 20...Nxf2+ forces White to either accept a draw or a worse endgame: either 21.Kg2 Nh4+ 22.Kg1 (22.gxh4? Qg6+ 23.Ng4 Nxg4 with an extra pawn and an ongoing attack) Nh3+ 23.Kh1 Nf2+ with a repetition, or 21.Kg1 Nh3+ 22.Kg2 Ngf4+ 23.gxf4 Nxf4+ 24.Rxf4 exf4 with possibly a slight advantage for Black. abcdefgh8877665544332211abcdefghPosition after 56.Rb1. 56...Rhh7? left the h7-rook temporarily unable to defend the e6-pawn, enabling the breakthrough 57.b5.
abcdefgh8877665544332211abcdefghPosition after 20.Nd2. 20...Nxf2+ forces White to either accept a draw or a worse endgame: either 21.Kg2 Nh4+ 22.Kg1 (22.gxh4? Qg6+ 23.Ng4 Nxg4 with an extra pawn and an ongoing attack) Nh3+ 23.Kh1 Nf2+ with a repetition, or 21.Kg1 Nh3+ 22.Kg2 Ngf4+ 23.gxf4 Nxf4+ 24.Rxf4 exf4 with possibly a slight advantage for Black.abcdefgh8877665544332211abcdefghPosition after 56.Rb1. 56...Rhh7? left the h7-rook temporarily unable to defend the e6-pawn, enabling the breakthrough 57.b5.
abcdefgh
88
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
abcdefgh
88
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh

Game 10 was a Ruy Lopez anti-Berlin. In keeping with his game plan, Karjakin tried to remain as solid as possible. A critical moment arose after Carlsen's 20.Nd2, which allowed Black to force a draw or a favourable endgame (see diagram). Karjakin said in the press conference that he thought Carlsen could meet 20...Nxf2+ with 21.Kg1, and missed 21...Nh3+ 22.Kg2 Ngf4+ 23.gxf4 Nxf4+ 24.Rxf4 Qxf4 "and black can never lose" (Carlsen); however Wesley So thought White still had an edge after either 24...Qxf4 or 24...exf4.

Reminiscent of games 3 and 4, the game evolved into one in which Carlsen could constantly press, while Karjakin defended. Carlsen steadily improved the position of his pieces, but had no breakthrough until Karjakin played the inaccurate 56...Rhh7?, which allowed Carlsen to play the break 57.b5! at a favourable time. Karjakin tried to actively seek counterplay, but Carlsen fended him off and simplified into a winning endgame, earning Karjakin's resignation.

Game 11: Karjakin–Carlsen, ½–½

Position after 18...c3

In his last game with the white pieces at standard time controls, Karjakin opened with 1.e4, and the game developed into the seventh Ruy Lopez of the match. Carlsen chose a variation which has given White "free pressure" (Svidler) in the past, but Karjakin failed to make the most of his theoretical edge. Instead it was Carlsen who was playing for the win, with the pawn sacrifice 18...c3 19.bxc3 d5!? This led to a passed pawn for Black that advanced all the way to the 2nd rank, but with his own king exposed, Black could not make progress and fend off a threatened perpetual check at the same time, resulting in a draw.

Game 12: Carlsen–Karjakin, ½–½

Final position

Game 12 ended in a very short draw, the shortest of the match under standard time controls. Carlsen signaled his willingness to accept a quick draw by playing one of the most solid variations against the Berlin Defense. Karjakin did not disagree, and after mass exchanges the game was drawn in 30 moves, the earliest allowed by the rules of the match, and after only 35 minutes of play (for comparison several of the earlier games in the match took over 6 hours to conclude). In the post-game interview, Carlsen seemed keen on enjoying Wednesday's challenge of quicker tie-breaking games.

Agon Director Ilya Merenzon said during the press conference that fans holding tickets for round 12 would get into the tiebreak for free.

This game holds the dubious distinction of being the fastest game to finish in World Championship history, quicker even than various forfeits that have occurred as they require 1 hour to elapse before the player forfeits.

Tie-break games

Game 13: Karjakin–Carlsen, ½–½

Final position

The first tie-break game was level throughout, with neither player gaining a significant advantage.

Game 14: Carlsen–Karjakin, ½–½

Position after 78...h5! 79.gxh5 f5 80.Bxf5 Rxe7+ 81.Kxe7, which forces a draw: there is no way to dislodge the black king from the corner (see wrong rook pawn).

This game started with the Italian Opening instead of the more common Ruy Lopez. After a series of exchanges at moves 35–37 Karjakin found himself with a rook and pawn against Carlsen's two bishops. While materially equal in value, the open nature of the position gave the bishops great scope, and Carlsen had all the winning chances. By move 40, Karjakin had just 59 seconds remaining, whereas Carlsen still had 4 minutes. Carlsen failed to find the winning approach to the end game, and in spite of his time situation, Karjakin managed to set up a wrong rook pawn position where his king could not be dislodged from h8/h7/g8. He then exchanged his rook for one of the bishops, ensuring the draw. Judit Polgár called Karjakin's defensive skills, finding the required moves with only seconds on the clock, "unbelievable".

Game 15: Karjakin–Carlsen, 0–1

Position after 37...Ra2. Karjakin (White) played 38.Rxc7?, allowing Carlsen to win with 38...Ra1.

Carlsen (Black) followed the same strategy he had used in the previous game: get ahead on the clock, then sacrifice a pawn (30...e4!) for active play. His pressure on Karjakin's position eventually bore fruit. On move 38, with less than 20 seconds left and in a slightly worse position, Karjakin blundered with 38.Rxc7?, allowing the winning 38...Ra1, which skewered the white queen and bishop.

This gave Carlsen a 2–1 lead with one rapid game to play.

Game 16: Carlsen–Karjakin 1–0

Position after 50.Qh6+!! It is mate next move (50...Kxh6 51.Rh8#; 50...gxh6 51.Rxf7#).

Karjakin, as Black, was forced to take risks, because he needed to win the game to avoid losing the match. He played the Sicilian Defence, the only appearance of that opening in the match. Carlsen played calmly with a weakness-free position while Karjakin desperately attempted to create chances. This did not work, and Carlsen soon gained an advantage. Karjakin might still have managed to hold a draw, but since he had to win he left himself open to a winning attack. Carlsen finished the game with the queen sacrifice 50.Qh6+!!, which leads to mate on the following move. Grandmaster Lubomir Kavalek described the move as "the most brilliant final move of any world chess championship in history."

Aftermath

A photo taken in 2024 of the table used in World Chess Championship 2016. The table is now housed by the Marshall Chess Club in New York City. The table was donated by World Chess, the Championship organizer.

Annotating for Chessbase, David Navara wrote that Carlsen deserved the title, as he has been the number 1 player in the world for many years, but also that Karjakin deserved credit for successfully showing that it was possible to compete on even terms with Carlsen. Karjakin said in the postmatch conference that he had played well below his capabilities in the tiebreaks and was unable to make use of his preparation. Nonetheless, he indicated that he would accept his invitation to the next Candidates Tournament to fight for another match for the title. In the immediate future, however, he will concentrate on his personal life (his son having taken his first steps during the match), which he had neglected for the duration of the match.

The manner in which the match ended – the World Classical Chess Champion title being decided in a rapid playoff – earned some criticism from Yasser Seirawan and former world champion Anatoly Karpov as inappropriate, considering that there is also a World Rapid Chess Champion title. Speaking on the format during the postmatch conference, Carlsen reiterated his preference for a different format for the title (probably a knockout format he had proposed in 2015), while Karjakin indicated he was happy with the match format.

Because of the even score in the classical portion of the match, Carlsen lost 13 rating points in the December 2016 FIDE ratings list, while Karjakin gained 13 points. Carlsen remained the top player in the world, 17 points ahead of Fabiano Caruana, while Karjakin rose to sixth.

Carlsen and Karjakin played their next classical game at the 2017 Tata Steel tournament, and the game was drawn. The next decisive classical game was at Norway Chess 2017, with Carlsen winning.

External links