United Kingdom transport modal share from 1952 to 2014, Department for Transport

A modal share (also called mode split, mode-share, or modal split) is the percentage of travelers using a particular type of transportation or number of trips using said type. In freight transportation, this may be measured in mass.

Modal share is an important component in developing sustainable transport within a city or region. In recent years, many cities have set modal share targets for balanced and sustainable transport modes, particularly 30% of non-motorized (cycling and walking) and 30% of public transport. These goals reflect a desire for a modal shift, or a change between modes, and usually encompasses an increase in the proportion of trips made using sustainable modes.

Comparability of data

Modal share data is usually obtained by travel surveys, which are often conducted by local governments, using different methodologies. Sampling and interviewing techniques, definitions, the extent of geographical areas and other methodological differences can influence comparability. Most typical surveys refer to the main mode of transport used during trips to work. Surveys covering entire metropolitan areas are preferred over city proper surveys which typically cover only the denser inner city. As of 26 August 2025[update] the reference years in these lists span over two decades, making comparisons problematic, especially given changing population, new transportation infrastructure and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, among other factors.

Modal split of journeys to work

The following tables present the modal split of journeys to work. It is better to use a measure of all trips on a typical weekday, but journey to work data is more readily available. It would also be beneficial to disaggregate private motor vehicles figures to car driver, car passengers and motorbikes (especially relevant for Asian cities).

Metropolitan areas with over 1,000,000 inhabitants

Metro areaWalkingCyclingPublic transportPrivate motor vehicleYearSurvey areaCountry
Australia Adelaide3%1%11%85%2016GCCSAAustralia
United States Atlanta1%0%3%86%2016UAUSA
Mexico Mexico City1%1%71%22%2019Mexico
Greece Athens8%2%37%53%2006Greece
New Zealand Auckland5%1%12%81%2018MUANew Zealand
United States Austin2%1%3%83%2019USA
United States Baltimore3%0%7%84%2016UAUSA
Spain Barcelona34.35%2.28%37.33%26.04%2018Spain
China Beijing21%32%26%21%2005/2011China
Serbia Belgrade23%1%49%27%2015Serbia
Germany Berlin34%18%26%22%2023Germany
Australia Brisbane4%1%14%81%2016GCCSAAustralia
Belgium Brussels36%9%24%29%2022Belgium
Colombia Bogotá24%7%43%15%2019Colombia
United States Boston5%1%14%73%2016UAUSA
Romania Bucharest31%2%27%36%2015Other (taxi): 4%Romania
Hungary Budapest32%1%47%20%2011Hungary
Canada Calgary4%1%8%84%2021CMACanada
United States Chicago7.1%1.8%20.5%51%2024USA
Germany Cologne25%19%21%35%2017Germany
United States Dallas1%0%2%90%2016UAUSA
South Korea Daejeon26%2%28%44%2012South Korea
India Delhi21%12%48%19%2008/2011India
United States Detroit1%0%2%92%2016USA
United States Denver2%1%4%81%2020UAUSA
Bangladesh Dhaka19%39%29%13%2009Bangladesh
Republic of Ireland Dublin18%7%15%59%2020Ireland
Canada Edmonton3%1%6%87%2021CMACanada
China Guangzhou35%19%22%23%2021China
Germany Hamburg22%22%24%32%2022Germany
Finland Helsinki10.99%9.34%32.42%46%2016MA, Other: 0.5%Finland
Hong Kong Hong Kong11%0.5%77%12%2011China
United States Houston1%0%2%91%2016UAUSA
United States Indianapolis1%0%1%91%2016UAUSA
Indonesia Jakarta1%0.2%20%78%*2019UA *67% motorbikeIndonesia
Malaysia Kuala Lumpur0.5%0.5%21%78%2018Malaysia
United States Las Vegas1%0%4%90%2016UAUSA
United Kingdom London26%2.5%44.5%27%2020UK
United States Los Angeles3%1%5%85%2016UAUSA
Spain Madrid34%0.5%25%40%2018Spain
Philippines Manila9%2%44%45%2019Philippines
Australia Melbourne4%2%19%76%2016GCCSAAustralia
United States Miami2%1%4%87%2016UAUSA
Italy Milan18%10%41%29%2014Italy
Belarus Minsk13%1%63%20%2016Belarus
Canada Montreal5%2%22%70%2016CMACanada
India Mumbai27%6%52%15%2008/2011India
Germany Munich33%21%22%24%2023Germany
Japan Nagoya15%13%30%43%2011Japan
United States New York City30.7%1.1%32.1%30.2%2019UAUSA
Japan Osaka7%19%61%13%2010Japan
Canada Ottawa8%2%18%72%2016CMACanada
France Paris40%2%22%34%2020ParisiensFrance
Australia Perth3%1%12%84%2016GCCSAAustralia
United States Philadelphia4%1%10%80%2016UAUSA
United States Phoenix2%1%2%87%2016UAUSA
United States Portland3%3%7%78%2016UAUSA
Czech Republic Prague35%1%37%25%2021Czech Republic
Brazil Rio de Janeiro29%3%43%25%2012UABrazil
Italy Rome4%1%29%66%2014Italy
United States San Antonio2%0%3%90%2016UAUSA
United States San Diego3%1%3%85%2016UAUSA
United States San Francisco5%2%20%64%2016UAUSA
United States San Jose2%2%5%84%2016UAUSA
Chile Santiago34.5%4%29.6%25.7%2012UAChile
Brazil São Paulo32%1%36%31%2017UABrazil
United States Seattle4%1%10%77%2016UAUSA
South Korea SeoulN/A4%66%23%2014South Korea
China Shanghai27%20%33%20%2009/2011China
Singapore Singapore22%1%44%33%2011Singapore
Bulgaria SofiaN/AN/A73%27%2010Bulgaria
Sweden Stockholm14%7%47%32%2011Sweden
Australia Sydney5%1%27%65%2020DeloitteAustralia
Taiwan Taipei13%4%43%40%2016Taiwan
Israel Tel Aviv8.2%4.3%17.7%62.5%2022Israel
Japan Tokyo23%14%51%12%2008/2009Japan
Canada Toronto5%1%16%76%2021CMACanada
Canada Vancouver6%2%15%75%2021CMACanada
Austria Vienna30%11%34%25%2024Austria
Poland Warsaw18%3%47%32%2015Poland
United States Washington, D.C.3%1%6%56%2022UAUSA

Metropolitan areas with over 250,000 inhabitants

Metro areawalkingcyclingpublic transportprivate motor vehicleyear
Denmark Aarhus7%27%19%43%2004
Spain Alicante18%0%13%69%2004
Netherlands Amsterdam5%30%19%42%2020
Italy Bari13%1%14%72%2001
Switzerland Basel33%17%27%22%2015
Switzerland Bern30%15%32%22%2015
Spain Bilbao68.1%0.9%19.6%11.1%2021
United Kingdom Birmingham1%1%25%66%2001
Italy Bologna8%4%21%67%2001
Germany Bonn28%15%17%41%2017
Slovakia Bratislava26.7%1.6%32.6%37.7%2014
Czech Republic Brno5%2%57%32%2012
United States Buffalo6%1%14%79%2012
Germany Bremen25%25%15%36%2018
United Kingdom Bristol19%8%12%55%2011
Australia Canberra5%3%8%85%2016
New Zealand Christchurch4%6%5%84%2018
Denmark Copenhagen30%26%18%26%2021
Spain Córdoba18%1%10%71%2004
Germany Dortmund19%10%22%49%2019
Germany Dresden26%18%20%36%2018
Republic of Ireland Dublin13.2%7.6%21.5%48.5%2016
Germany Düsseldorf34%13%18%35%2017
United Kingdom Edinburgh19%7%30%42%2009–2010
Netherlands Eindhoven3%24%8%65%2004
Germany Essen19%7%19%55%2019
Italy Florence8%4%21%69%2001
Germany Frankfurt11%15%30%44%2015
Germany Freiburg im Breisgau29%34%16%21%2017
Belgium Gent15.6%33.8%11.2%39%2021
Poland Gdańsk20.8%5.9%32.1%41.2%2016
Spain Gijón24%0%17%59%2004
Sweden Gothenburg12%14%21%52%2004
Austria Graz19%19%20%42%2018
Netherlands The Hague5%22%30%43%2004
Canada Halifax8%1%12%78%2016
Canada Hamilton4%1%10%84%2016
Germany Hanover26%19%19%36%2017
Poland Kraków28.4%1.2%36.3%33.7%2013
Spain Las Palmas15%0.42%13%68%2011
Portugal Lisbon15.6%2.5%30.8%50.2%2020
Spain Málaga12%0%11%77%2004
Sweden Malmö14%26%25%34%2018
Spain Murcia18%1%7%74%2004
Italy Naples13%0%26%60%2001
Germany Nuremberg30%15%23%32%2023
Norway Oslo32%6%31%29%2022
Italy Palermo12%1%9%78%2001
Spain Pamplona42%2%13%41%2013
Poland Poznań20.6%8.4%33.7%37.3%2019
Canada Quebec City2%6%11%80%2016
Netherlands Rotterdam5%14%25%56%2004
Spain Seville13%7%18%62%2014
Germany Stuttgart29%8%23%40%2017
Estonia Tallinn14%2%34%49%2020
Finland Tampere10%10%14%66%2021
Italy Turin12%3%5%79%2004
Netherlands Utrecht25.3%48.4%5.4%18.7%2018
Spain Valencia16%1%21%62%2004
Spain Valladolid22%1%20%57%2004
Spain Vigo19%0%13%68%2004
Lithuania Vilnius36%0%26%38%2011
Spain Vitoria-Gasteiz45.6%8.0%9.5%35.5%2021
New Zealand Wellington21%4%23%49%2018
Canada Victoria (CMA)10%7%11%70%2016
Canada Winnipeg5%2%14%79%2016
Poland Wrocław24.2%6.3%27.6%41.4%2018
Spain Zaragoza45.91%2.90%23.71%26.88%2017
Switzerland Zürich33%12%32%21%2015
Mean ± SD13±8%8±9%24±13%55±17%

Notes: European data is based on the Urban Audit

Modal share targets

The Charter of Brussels, signed by 36 cities including Brussels, Ghent, Milan, Munich, Seville, Edinburgh, Toulouse, Bordeaux, Gdansk, and Timișoara, commits the signatories to achieve at least 15% of bicycling modal share by 2020, and calls upon European institutions to do likewise. The cycling modal share is strongly associated with the size of local cycling infrastructure.

The Canadian city of Hamilton adopted a similar modal share target plan in 2005.

Modal share in the developing world

The modal share differs considerably depending on each city in the developing world.

According to UNECE, the global on-road vehicle fleet is to double by 2050 (from 1,2 billion to 2,5 billion, see introduction), with most future car purchases taking place in developing countries. Some experts even mention that the number of vehicles in developing countries will increase by 4 or 5-fold by 2050 (compared to current car use levels), and that the majority of these will be second-hand.

Legislation impacting the modal share

Legislation can discourage car ownership through, for example, taxation and conditions on new car purchases). This could help in achieving a modal shift.

See also

Notes

External links

  • 2014-03-31 at the Wayback Machine
  • – Modal share data and trends over the past 20 years for Australian cities (unpublished paper by David Ashley)